2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of hydrogen chemisorption for the determination of Ru dispersion in Ru/γ-alumina catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
86
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the 1970s, many XPS studies have been performed to examine the chemical state of rhenium catalyst surfaces; however, due to instrumentation limitations, these studies were performed ex-situ. [14,20,23,[31][32][33][34][35] The problem with ex-situ studies is that the rhenium oxidation states that are measured postreaction can differ substantially from the species that are present in-situ.…”
Section: -315mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1970s, many XPS studies have been performed to examine the chemical state of rhenium catalyst surfaces; however, due to instrumentation limitations, these studies were performed ex-situ. [14,20,23,[31][32][33][34][35] The problem with ex-situ studies is that the rhenium oxidation states that are measured postreaction can differ substantially from the species that are present in-situ.…”
Section: -315mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] Among these methods, reduction by chemical agents has been the most extensively studied: the use of polyol as a reducing agent is particularly approached by different groups. [7,[30][31][32][33] Frequently, Ru nanosystems are obtained by reduction of RuCl 3 in glycols, such as ethylene glycol or diethylene glycol, [12,[34][35][36] hydrogen reduction [37] or sodium borohydride reduction. [38] Ru nanoparticles are also prepared by using polymers, [39] ligands like amines, alcohols or thiols, [24,25] cellulose derivatives [40] and organosilane fragments [41] as stabilizers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both methods give catalytically active materials, IE is generally more reproducible and reliable than IW, which results in relatively non-uniform metal distribution, size and shape [44]. Nevertheless, there are limited reports that investigate optimisation of those methods or how the metal distribution is affected by different parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%