2022
DOI: 10.1111/inm.13005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of recovery model in forensic psychiatric settings: A Foucauldian critique

Abstract: Recovery, a model of care aimed at patient-led nursing practice emphasizing autonomy, hope and self-determination, has in recent years been adapted for the secure forensic psychiatric setting. Often referred to as 'secure recovery', this model suggests the aims of recovery are achievable even in highly restrictive settings. This paper will adopt a Foucauldian perspective to offer a critical analysis of recovery in forensic settings. In providing recovery-oriented care, nurses utilize pastoral power in guiding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Durcan ( 34 ) claimed that “the recovery journey of people in forensic services is significantly different from others,” which is—to some extent—due to the fact that introducing RO as a guiding principle of work in secure forensic wards comes within juridical and technical problems, which are settled in the special features of the field. Johansson and Holmes ( 35 ) offered a critical analysis of recovery in secure institutions from a Foucauldian perspective. They conclude that forensic patients must submit to the prevailing worldview of neoliberal personal responsibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durcan ( 34 ) claimed that “the recovery journey of people in forensic services is significantly different from others,” which is—to some extent—due to the fact that introducing RO as a guiding principle of work in secure forensic wards comes within juridical and technical problems, which are settled in the special features of the field. Johansson and Holmes ( 35 ) offered a critical analysis of recovery in secure institutions from a Foucauldian perspective. They conclude that forensic patients must submit to the prevailing worldview of neoliberal personal responsibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is perhaps most apparent in the "secure recovery" of forensic mental health services. As we have argued elsewhere (Johansson & Holmes, 2022), secure recovery cannot escape the correctional context in which it exists, and it only serves to produce patients who can fit within the expectations of proper neoliberal (humanist) subjectivity-that of the productive member of society. Those who do not conform to such expectations are left to languish within the institution (McKeown et al, 2016); in effect, only those who exit the interiority of the forensic environment must still exist interior to the greater expectations of myriad State apparatuses.…”
Section: Recovery: What Next?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The humanist emphasis within the health sciences can also be observed in the importance given to patient-centered care (Pilnick, 2023), where empathy, compassion, and a 'holistic approach' to healthcare are considered paramount to promote the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual aspects of patients' well-being (Rogers, 2004). More recently, the patientoriented paradigm pushed these principles further by producing an alienated, biomedicalized patient body that is integrated into every aspect of the health research endeavor (Johansson & Holmes, 2022;Turcotte et al, 2023). According to us, most nursing conceptual models and theories incorporate humanistic principles to guide nursing practice and provide a broad framework for delivering patient-centered care (see Roy, 2009;Watson, 2011, to name a few).…”
Section: The Problem Of the Human In The Health Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%