The Use of Implantoplasty and Guided Bone Regeneration in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis: Two Case Reports

Suh, Jong-Jin; Simon, Ziv; Jeon, Young-Sik; Choi, Byeong-Gap; Kim, Chong-Kwan

doi:10.1097/01.id.0000091139.04246.bc

Cited by 21 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This approach was proposed by Lang et al [6] and reported by Suh et al [7], and seeks to reduce the roughness of the implant surface which facilitates the colonization of biofilms [8-10] because it has been demonstrated that smoother surfaces retain less bacteria [11]. Rimondini et al (2000) tested fifteen polishing procedures in vitro .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Non-surgical Methods

Valderrama¹,

Blansett²,

Gonzalez³

et al. 2014

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this review is to summarize the findings of studies that have evaluated non-surgical approaches for detoxification of implant body surfaces in vitro and in vivo, and to evaluate clinical trials on the use of these methodologies for treating peri-implant disease.Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) from 1966 to 2013. In vitro and in vivo studies as well as clinical trials on non-surgical therapy were evaluated. The outcome variables were the ability of the therapeutic method to eliminate the biofilm and endotoxins from the implant surface, the changes in clinical parameters including probing depth, clinical attachment levels, bleeding on probing; radiographic bone fill and histological re-osseointegration. Results: From 134 articles found 35 were analyzed. The findings, advantages and disadvantages of using lasers as well as mechanical and chemical methods are discussed. Most of the in vivo and human studies used combination therapies which makes determining the efficacy of one specific method difficult. Most human studies are case series with short term longitudinal analysis without survival or failure reports. Conclusion: Complete elimination of the biofilms is difficult to achieve using these approaches. All therapies induce changes of the chemical and physical properties of the implant surface. Re-osseointegration may be difficult to achieve if not impossible without surgical access to ensure thorough debridement of the defect and detoxification of the implant surface. Combination protocols for non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in humans have shown some positive clinical results but long-term evaluation to evaluate the validity and reliability of the techniques is needed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Non-surgical Methods

Valderrama¹,

Blansett²,

Gonzalez³

et al. 2014

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Initially recommended by Lang et al [8] and reported by Suh et al [9], this technique aims to reduce the roughness of the titanium surface to decrease plaque adherence since it has been demonstrated that rough surfaces accumulate more plaque than smooth or moderately rough surfaces [10–12]. In vitro studies have shown that the use of diamond polishing devices can remove the coating of the implant surface entirely thus exposing the body of the fixture [13].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If DFDBA was added, 2.37 mm of re-osseointegration was obtained [64]. Case reports in humans have shown that a 50 mg/mL of T applied for 5 minutes after implantoplasty or AP and followed by autogenous bone graft or xenograft and membrane resulted in arrest of the disease and radiographic bone fill of the peri-implant defects [9, 65, 66]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Surgical Methods

Valderrama

Wilson²

2013

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. Peri-implantitis is one of the major causes of implant failure. The detoxification of the implant surface is necessary to obtain reosseointegration. The aim of this review was to summarize in vitro and in vivo studies as well as clinical trials that have evaluated surgical approaches for detoxification of the implant body surfaces. Materials and Methods. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed) from 1966 to 2013. The outcome variables were the ability of the therapeutic method to eliminate the biofilm and endotoxins from the implant surface, the changes in clinical parameters, radiographic bone fill, and histological reosseointegration. Results. From 574 articles found, 76 were analyzed. The findings, advantages, and disadvantages of using mechanical, chemical methods and lasers are discussed. Conclusions. Complete elimination of the biofilms is difficult to achieve. All therapies induce changes of the chemical and physical properties of the implant surface. Partial reosseointegration after detoxification has been reported in animals. Combination protocols for surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in humans have shown some positive clinical and radiographic results, but long-term evaluation to evaluate the validity and reliability of the techniques is needed.

show abstract

“…Multiple graft materials such as autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts are used, either with or without the use of barrier membranes (absorbable/nonresorbable). 50,51,55,56,75 These studies showed improvement of the clinical and radiographic parameters as evidenced by the reduction in PD and bone fill. As mentioned previously, there is no strong evidence to support the use of barrier membranes.…”

Section: Treatment Of Periimplantitismentioning

confidence: 89%

Decision Tree for the Management of Periimplant Diseases

Okayasu

Wang²

2011

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of implants reflects one of the foremost breakthroughs of dentistry. As the market keeps growing exponentially, the implantologist faces an unavoidable challenge, that is, how to deal with the complications associated with implants. Literature published so far has focused in dealing with the technical and surgical aspects of implant therapy. Information regarding the management of periimplant diseases is rather lacking. Hence, the purpose of this article is to provide an overview and description of periimplant diseases, along with treatment recommendations.

show abstract

The Use of Implantoplasty and Guided Bone Regeneration in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis: Two Case Reports

Cited by 21 publications

References 28 publications

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Non-surgical Methods

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Non-surgical Methods

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Surgical Methods

Decision Tree for the Management of Periimplant Diseases

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About