2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002650000259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of incubation behavior to adjust avian reproductive costs after egg laying

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expected a higher incubation cost, more female nest attendance and higher frequency of incubation feeding in larger clutches (Martin and Wiebe 2000). However, in our study male incubation feeding was not associated with clutch size, similar to observations on the Great Tits (Parus major; Matysioková and Remeš 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We expected a higher incubation cost, more female nest attendance and higher frequency of incubation feeding in larger clutches (Martin and Wiebe 2000). However, in our study male incubation feeding was not associated with clutch size, similar to observations on the Great Tits (Parus major; Matysioková and Remeš 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Greater Prairie-Chicken (95% Tympanuchus cupido), and White-tailed Ptarmigan (95%; Lagopus leucura; Wiebe & Martin, 2000, Deeming, 2002, Coates & Delehanty, 2008, Winder et al, 2016. However, our estimates of nest attentiveness were similar to other related species such as the Sichuan Partridge (82%, Arborophila rufipectus) and…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Female nest attendance and the frequency of male incubation feeding were unrelated to clutch size (Matysioková & Remeš , Amininasab et al . , but see Martin & Wiebe , Kötél et al . ) and did not differ between yearling and older males or females (as reported in previous studies: Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%