The use of inert artificial commercial food sources as replacements of traditional live food items in the culture of larval shrimp, Farfantepenaeus aztecus

Robinson, Curtis; Samocha, Tzachi M.; Fox, Jonathan H.; Gandy, Ryan L.; McKee, David A.

doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.11.051

Cited by 33 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the survival rate of brown larval shrimp ( Farfantepenaeus aztecus ) significantly decreased from 90.86 ± 3.19% when fed live microalgae, to 14.865 ± 14.35% in shrimp fed with 100% replacement E-Z larvae [179]. …”

Section: Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Algal Proteins: Extraction, Application, and Challenges Concerning Production

Bleakley

Hayes

2017

Foods

733

418

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Population growth combined with increasingly limited resources of arable land and fresh water has resulted in a need for alternative protein sources. Macroalgae (seaweed) and microalgae are examples of under-exploited “crops”. Algae do not compete with traditional food crops for space and resources. This review details the characteristics of commonly consumed algae, as well as their potential for use as a protein source based on their protein quality, amino acid composition, and digestibility. Protein extraction methods applied to algae to date, including enzymatic hydrolysis, physical processes, and chemical extraction and novel methods such as ultrasound-assisted extraction, pulsed electric field, and microwave-assisted extraction are discussed. Moreover, existing protein enrichment methods used in the dairy industry and the potential of these methods to generate high value ingredients from algae, such as bioactive peptides and functional ingredients are discussed. Applications of algae in human nutrition, animal feed, and aquaculture are examined.

show abstract

Section: Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Algal Proteins: Extraction, Application, and Challenges Concerning Production

Bleakley

Hayes

2017

Foods

733

418

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is no nutrient or naturally occurring substance (including enzymes, hormones, pigments, polysaccharides, organic acids, or beneficial microflora) present with live foods and/or fresh natural feed items such as marine polychaetes, Artemia , or squid that cannot be put into a fully biosecure commercially formulated dry, semi‐moist, or liquid shrimp feed. For a review of recent studies concerning the replacement of live and/or fresh natural food items see: Broodstock feeds: Summavielle et al ; Mendoza et al ; Du et al , , ; Perez‐Velazquez et al ; Wouters et al ; Fegan ; Bao‐Shuenn et al ; Meunpol et al , , ; Zhou et al ; Saito et al ; Paibulkichakul et al ; Wu et al ; Matinfar et al ; Argueello‐Guevara and Molina‐Poveda ; Chimsung ; Dhert ; Ortiz Larval feeds: Jones et al ; Galgani and Aquacop ; Coutteau et al ; Muir and Sutton ; Jaime et al , ; Garcia‐Ortega et al ; Jones ; Samocha et al ; Medina‐Reyna et al ; D'souza et al ; Gallardo et al ; Calderon et al ; Fegan ; Robinson et al ; Wang and Mai ; D'Abramo et al ; Jaime‐Ceballos et al , ; Zeng and Wang ; Sirvas‐Cornejo et al ; Gamboa‐Delgado and Le Vay ; Ramya and Felix ; Xie et al , ; Anh et al ; Ghaen et al ; Dhert ; Naessens et al …”

Section: Need For a New Generation Of Biosecure Shrimp Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biosecure Shrimp Feeds and Feeding Practices: Guidelines for Future Development

Tacon

2017

J World Aquaculture Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the purposes of this paper, biosecure shrimp feeds and on‐farm feeding strategies refer to the “feed, whether live, fresh, or formulated, and the management of the feed on the farm, should not be an entry point of potential pathogens to the shrimp and/or to the culture system.” The paper reviews the different feeds commonly used for the production of farmed shrimp and discusses their potential risks from a disease perspective, including the use of live hatchery and nursery feeds, the use of live and/or fresh food organisms for the production of broodstock, and the use of dry formulated shrimp feeds for shrimp growout operations. In addition, the paper discusses the critical role played by feed‐processing techniques for the pasteurization and destruction of pathogens within shrimp feeds and the need for nutritionists to formulate feeds for optimal nutrition and health, and not just for optimal growth. The importance of the development and implementation of good on‐farm feed management practices by farmers is discussed, including the prohibition of the top‐dressing of pelleted feeds on farm by farmers with unapproved feed additives such as antibiotics. Finally, the paper discusses the responsibilities of farmers, feed manufacturers, and traders regarding the development and use of recommended biosecure shrimp feeds and feeding practices.

show abstract

“…Penaeid shrimp larvae show good acceptance of inert diets in co-feeding regimes and different methods have been applied to evaluate the physical, chemical and nutritional performance of new microdiets. Among the latter, larval growth, metamorphosis and survival rates, diverse condition indexes and stress tests are some of the assessment methods used to indirectly evaluate the nutritional quality of larval and postlarval diets (Gallardo et al, 2002;Robinson et al, 2005). Valuable information has also been gathered through the assessment of ingestion rates (Kurmaly et al, 1989a;Rosas et al, 1995;de Lima and Souza-Santos, 2007), digestion and enzyme activity (Le Vay et al, 1993;Kumlu and Jones, 1995;Brito et al, 2001) and estimation of diet assimilation (Sumule et al, 2003;Jiménez-Yan et al, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artemia replacement in co-feeding regimes for mysis and postlarval stages of Litopenaeus vannamei: Nutritional contribution of inert diets to tissue growth as indicated by natural carbon stable isotopes

Gamboa‐Delgado

Vay

2009

Aquaculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The nutritional contribution from co-fed Artemia nauplii and inert diets to growth in mysis and early postlarval shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei was assessed by analyzing the carbon stable isotope ratios (δ 13 C) in diets and shrimp tissue. Artemia nauplii and inert diets showed significantly different δ 13 C values but similar carbon contents and were supplied as single diets and also in three co-feeding regimes in which 25, 50 and 75% of the Artemia was replaced by inert diet on a dry weight basis, so that all feeding regimes provided similar amounts of dietary carbon. Shrimp δ 13 C values were significantly influenced by the different feeding regimes and reached isotopic equilibrium with their respective diets as soon as 5 days. Survival was significantly higher in co-fed animals than in those fed either Artemia or inert diet alone. There was no significant difference in growth between shrimp fed on Artemia only and those co-fed Artemia with inert diet, although the variability was high. Growth and survival were very low in shrimp fed only inert diet. Results from an isotope mixing model suggest that observed nutrient contributions from Artemia nauplii were significantly higher than expected contributions indicated by proportions established in the co-feeding regimes. Nutrient contributions to growth in the dietary regime providing equal carbon amounts of each diet type ranged from 77 to 86% for Artemia and from 13 to 24% for inert diet. Shrimp fed the 25% Artemia replacement regime exhibited a significantly higher retention of dietary carbon from the inert diet than those fed inert diet alone. This may have resulted from greater ingestion and/or assimilation of the inert diet in the presence of Artemia, combined with the higher growth rate in the co-feeding treatment. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of up to 50% replacement of Artemia with inert diet for L. vannamei mysis and early postlarval stages, indicating also that the inert diet may provide specific nutrients that promote survival, while digestibility may limit its contribution to tissue growth. The 3 influence of maternal and dietary sources on δ 13 C values in earlier larval stages was also described.

show abstract

The use of inert artificial commercial food sources as replacements of traditional live food items in the culture of larval shrimp, Farfantepenaeus aztecus

Cited by 33 publications

References 16 publications

Algal Proteins: Extraction, Application, and Challenges Concerning Production

Algal Proteins: Extraction, Application, and Challenges Concerning Production

Biosecure Shrimp Feeds and Feeding Practices: Guidelines for Future Development

Artemia replacement in co-feeding regimes for mysis and postlarval stages of Litopenaeus vannamei: Nutritional contribution of inert diets to tissue growth as indicated by natural carbon stable isotopes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About