2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of inhaled sevoflurane during operative hysteroscopy is associated with increased glycine absorption compared to intravenous propofol for maintenance of anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, sufficient depth of anesthesia and analgesic intensity is required. Admittedly, intraspinal anesthesia can provide adequate analgesia and satisfactory patient cooperation, but it is not conducive to rapid postoperative recovery of patients [14]. With the application of propofol and remifentanil in clinical practice, short IV anesthesia is possible and can be easily accepted by surgeons and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, sufficient depth of anesthesia and analgesic intensity is required. Admittedly, intraspinal anesthesia can provide adequate analgesia and satisfactory patient cooperation, but it is not conducive to rapid postoperative recovery of patients [14]. With the application of propofol and remifentanil in clinical practice, short IV anesthesia is possible and can be easily accepted by surgeons and patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of sevoflurane was associated with significantly more glycine absorption than propofol. 27 Our results were further enhanced by the use of spinal anesthesia. This was supported by the findings of Moharram et al 28 that spinal anesthesia was associated with less glycine absorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…35 Lastly, a study by Munmany et al published in 2016 compared propofol infusion with inhaled sevoflurane at the time of operative hysteroscopy and noted a significantly lower deficit for the group receiving propofol (median deficit 202 mL, range 60-542 mL vs median deficit 264, range 153-932, P5.007). 33 Shokeir et al compared oxytocin infusion at a rate of 400 milliunits/min with a control group at the time of endometrial resection and found reduced mean fluid absorption in the intervention group (490.3 mL vs 660.0 mL, P5004). Total fluid use, operative time, and complications were otherwise similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%