Handbook of Intelligence 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1562-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Intelligence Tests in the Diagnosis of Specific Reading Disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The screening and identification process for dyslexia can be challenging due to its complex nature. However, Cognitive and achievement tests serve as fundamental tools for diagnosing dyslexia [32]. However, dyslexic children continue to face ongoing challenges, often due to a lack of teacher awareness about dyslexia and inadequate screening [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The screening and identification process for dyslexia can be challenging due to its complex nature. However, Cognitive and achievement tests serve as fundamental tools for diagnosing dyslexia [32]. However, dyslexic children continue to face ongoing challenges, often due to a lack of teacher awareness about dyslexia and inadequate screening [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, children with learning disabilities were screened mainly through three ways: the ability–achievement discrepancy approach, Response to Intervention (RTI) and cognitive and neuropsychological assessment of Processing Strengths and Weaknesses (PSW). However, a large number of subsequent studies believed that the ability–achievement discrepancy approach was inefficient to some extent [ 1 ], and the RTI was only a preventive method for early identification and intervention of students with learning disabilities, rather than a screening method for students with learning disabilities [ 2 ]. The PSW has significant advantages in accurately identifying students with special learning disabilities, understanding their learning problems, and providing targeted intervention plans [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%