The use of intermediary resins when bonding glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement to composite resin

Woolford, Mark; Grieve, A R

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01607.x

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[19] However, application of resin bonding agents promotes the adhesion of the resin composite to both conventional GIC and RMGIC. [20] Moreover, hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) incorporated into the glass ionomer cement, forms a chemical bond with the resin of the composite.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the shear bond strength of RMGIC to a resin composite using different adhesive systems: An in vitro study

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:This study evaluated and compared the role of newer dental adhesives to bond composite resin to the resin modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) liner.Materials and Methods:Thirty-six specimens were prepared on acrylic blocks, with wells prepared in it by drilling holes, to retain the RMGIC. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 12 specimens each. In group I, a thin layer of an adhesive, which was a Total-etch type (Adper Single bond-2), was applied between RMGIC and the composite resin. Ingroup II, a Self-Etch adhesive (Adper prompt-L pop) was applied, and in group III there was no application of any adhesive between RMGIC and the composite resin. After curing all the specimens, the shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine.Results:The results were drawn and tabulated using ANOVA-fishers and Tukey’s statistical tests. The maximum shear bond strength values were recorded in group II specimens with the self-etch adhesive (Adper prompt-L pop), showing a mean value of 5.826 when compared to the group I adhesive-Total-etch type with a mean shear bond strength of 4.6380, while group III specimens, where no adhesive was used, showed a minimum mean shear bond strength of 2.8385. There was a great and significant difference between group I and group II (P value 0.003), whereas, both group I and group II showed a vast and significant difference from group III (P value 0 – 001).Conclusion:Hence, this present study concludes that application of Self-Etch adhesive (Adper prompt-L pop) in between RMGIC and composite resin increases the shear bond strength between RMGIC and the resin composites, as compared to the Total-etch type adhesives (Adper Single Bond 2), as well as, without application of the adhesive agent.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the shear bond strength of RMGIC to a resin composite using different adhesive systems: An in vitro study

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1621] In the current study, both self-etch adhesive systems had higher SBS than the total-etch adhesive. This finding is consistent with the results obtained by Arora et al [9] and Kasraie et al [16] Similarly, Kandaswamy et al [2] concluded that mild self-etch adhesive had higher bond strength than the strong self-etch or total etch adhesive when they were applied on the unset GI cement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Bond strength between composite resin and resin modified glass ionomer using different adhesive systems and curing techniques

Boruziniat

Gharaei

2014

J Conserv Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:To evaluate bond strength between RMGI and composite using different adhesive systems and curing techniques.Materials and Methods:Sixty prepared samples of RMGI were randomly divided into six groups according to adhesive systems (total-etch, two-step self-etch and all-in-one) and curing techniques (co-curing and pre-curing). In co-curing technique, the adhesive systems were applied on uncured RMGI samples and co-cured together. In the pre-curing technique, before application of adhesive systems, the RMGI samples were cured. Composite layers were applied and shear bond strength was measured. Two samples of each group were evaluated by SEM. Failure mode was determined by streomicroscope.Results:Both curing methods and adhesive systems had significant effect on bond strength (P-value < 0.05). There was an interaction between two factors (P-value <0.05). Both self-etch adhesives had significantly higher shear bond strength than the total-etch adhesive (P-value <0.05). The co-curing technique improved the bond strength in self-etch adhesives, but decreased the bond strength in total-etch adhesive (P-value<0.05).Conclusion:The application of self-etch adhesive systems and co-curing technique can improve the bond strength between the RMGI and composite.

show abstract

“…The use of resin adhesive agents promotes RMGIC adherence to resin composites. 8 Furthermore, hydroxyethylmethacrylate integrated into the resin composite, builds a chemical adhesion with the RMGIC.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chemical Surface Modification Methods of Resin Composite Repaired with Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective This study examined the chemical surface modification methods of resin composite repaired with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). Materials and Methods Ninety aged resin composite rods were produced and sorted into 9 groups of 10 specimens and surface modified with silane agent and/or bonding agent as follows: group 1, no surface modified; group 2, etch + single bond 2 (SB2); group 3, SB2; group 4, etch + RelyX ceramic primer (RXP) + SB2; group 5, RXP + SB2; group 6, etch + single bond universal (SU); group 7, SU; group 8, etch + RXP + SU; and group 9, RXP + SU. A clear silicone mold was placed on the top of specimen center, and then filled with RMGIC. The specimens' shear bond strengths (SBSs) were examined in mechanical testing equipment. To determine failure types, the fractured specimen surfaces were inspected using a stereomicroscope. Statistical Analysis The data collected were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and significance level was operated using Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results Group 8 had the greatest SBS, but it was statistically indistinguishable from groups 4, 5, and 9. The most frequent fracture mode was adhesive failure. High SBS was commonly associated with mixed failure. Conclusion The use of bonding agents enhances the resin composite's wettability and allows it to bond to RMGIC. Moreover, the use of the silane coupling agent before applying bonding agent showed significantly higher bonding ability of resin composite and RMGIC interface.

show abstract

The use of intermediary resins when bonding glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement to composite resin

Cited by 6 publications

References 22 publications

Comparison of the shear bond strength of RMGIC to a resin composite using different adhesive systems: An in vitro study

Comparison of the shear bond strength of RMGIC to a resin composite using different adhesive systems: An in vitro study

Bond strength between composite resin and resin modified glass ionomer using different adhesive systems and curing techniques

Chemical Surface Modification Methods of Resin Composite Repaired with Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About