1995
DOI: 10.1097/00002517-199506000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Ketorolac in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Cost???Benefit Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Le Roux et at reported that the use of NSAIDS as the sole medication for pain control after spine surgery was not sufficient to provide adequate analgesia, 31 but when combined with opioids, the combination results in much better results than with either one alone. [31][32][33][34] Reuben SS et al reported NSAIDS has opioid sparing effect for postoperative pain management after spine surgery. 35 Ketorolac, given IM or IV, is the most investigated drug among the NSAIDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Le Roux et at reported that the use of NSAIDS as the sole medication for pain control after spine surgery was not sufficient to provide adequate analgesia, 31 but when combined with opioids, the combination results in much better results than with either one alone. [31][32][33][34] Reuben SS et al reported NSAIDS has opioid sparing effect for postoperative pain management after spine surgery. 35 Ketorolac, given IM or IV, is the most investigated drug among the NSAIDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] Turner DM et al reported ketorolac has provided good analgesia after lumbar spine surgery and less opioid requirement as well as it was cost effective. 34 Because its onset of action is not immediate (about 30-60 minutes after IM injection), its use in severe acute pain in the postoperative period is best as an adjuvant to opioids, rather than as a sole agent. There is also a concern regarding the deleterious effects of NSAIDS on bone healing, because of the importance of PGE2 in the early stages of bone healing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NSAIDs have proven to be beneficial in the multimodal management of pain following spinal fusion surgery, [8][9][10][11][12][13] many physicians refrain from the use of these drugs because of a possible deleterious effect on osteogenesis and spinal fusion. [17][18][19][20] Spinal fusion is a complex process that is influenced by multiple physiologic and mechanical factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13] A cost-benefit analysis revealed a net savings to the institution of over $211,000 per year or over $350 per patient in those patients receiving NSAIDs for lumbar spine surgery. 12 In addition to these short-term analgesic benefits, a reduction in acute pain provided by perioperative NSAID administration may also reduce long-term morbidity following spinal fusion surgery.…”
Section: Onsteroidalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opioid analgesics are the most widely used drugs but carry unpleasant side eff ects 19 . Nonsteroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have proven efficacy in ameliorating postoperative pain, especially following spinal surgery [20][21][22] . Side eff ects such as gastric irritation, inhibition of platelet aggregation and bleeding have restricted their wide use 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%