2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78490-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of L-Curve and U-Curve in Inverse Electromagnetic Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it may fail to find an appropriate λ when the point of the maximum curvature is difficult to detect [15,16], and the reconstructed images may tend to be oversmooth in some cases [17,19]. In previous studies, the U-curve method has been proposed and tested in some numerical applications [18,19] and FDOT problems [20]. In this study, the feasibility of the U-curve criterion for DFMT problems is investigated, and the performances are compared with those of the L-curve method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it may fail to find an appropriate λ when the point of the maximum curvature is difficult to detect [15,16], and the reconstructed images may tend to be oversmooth in some cases [17,19]. In previous studies, the U-curve method has been proposed and tested in some numerical applications [18,19] and FDOT problems [20]. In this study, the feasibility of the U-curve criterion for DFMT problems is investigated, and the performances are compared with those of the L-curve method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to L-curve, the U-curve method has been proposed [18,19], and its feasibility for FMT problems has been studied [20]. It has been proved that the U-curve always has a local minimum [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains the recent emergence of automated methods of selecting α that do not require a priori information about the solution, in particular, the L-curve method [23], the U-curve method [4] and the generalized cross-validation method [6]. Detailed information about them can also be found in monograph [8] and paper [15]. However, the practice of inverse problems solving, as it is also shown in [30], has demonstrated many situations where the implementation of these methods is linked to some mathematical challenges arising, for instance, from absence of a clearly defined angle in the L-curve or a local minimum of the U-curve in the interval of definition of the values of regularization parameter α.…”
Section: Fig 4 Algorithm For Non-stationary Loads Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the common methods to determine the regularization parameter in inverse problems are the L-curve method of Hansen (1992Hansen ( , 2000 and U -curve method of KrawczykStańDo and Rudnicki (2007) and Krawczyk-Stado and Rudnicki (2008). After trials with both methods we selected the U -curve method.…”
Section: Selection Of the Regularization Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%