2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of latent class analysis for identifying subtypes of depression: A systematic review

Abstract: Depression is a significant public health problem but symptom remission is difficult to predict. This may be due to substantial heterogeneity underlying the disorder. Latent class analysis (LCA) is often used to elucidate clinically relevant depression subtypes but whether or not consistent subtypes emerge is unclear. We sought to critically examine the implementation and reporting of LCA in this context by performing a systematic review to identify articles detailing the use of LCA to explore subtypes of depr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(251 reference statements)
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LCA is a person-centered approach that enables the examination of population heterogeneity by grouping individuals into homogenous subgroups (with similar symptom-profiles), or latent classes, on the basis of dichotomously rated indicators of symptoms (Collins & Lanza, 2010). Based on prior LCA research, including research on latent classes of posttraumatic stress symptoms (Hansen, Ross, & Armour, 2017) and depressive symptoms (Ulbricht, Chrysanthopoulou, Levin, & Lapane, 2018) two alternative outcomes were anticipated. The first possible outcome was that subgroups would emerge characterized by increasing probabilities 6 (e.g., low, moderate, high probability) of endorsing all PCBD symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LCA is a person-centered approach that enables the examination of population heterogeneity by grouping individuals into homogenous subgroups (with similar symptom-profiles), or latent classes, on the basis of dichotomously rated indicators of symptoms (Collins & Lanza, 2010). Based on prior LCA research, including research on latent classes of posttraumatic stress symptoms (Hansen, Ross, & Armour, 2017) and depressive symptoms (Ulbricht, Chrysanthopoulou, Levin, & Lapane, 2018) two alternative outcomes were anticipated. The first possible outcome was that subgroups would emerge characterized by increasing probabilities 6 (e.g., low, moderate, high probability) of endorsing all PCBD symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnostic of MDD in this population may be complex, given the characteristics such as increased somatization, masking symptoms, confusion with frequent life situations (bereavement, changes of address, loss of physical and mental abilities), or difficulty in making a differential diagnosis with dementia [7]. For a deeper understanding of the disorder and its heterogeneity in old age, recent research has been collecting evidence of clinically relevant depression subtypes [8]. For example, Sneed, J.R., et al found two types of depression, vascular and non-vascular depression [9], in two different samples of community-dwelling old people with a diagnosed previous major depressive episode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptive analyses of covariates including sex, age and weight category were examined for participants, as well as the frequency of responses for each of the 15 latent class indicators across all participants in the sample. For the primary objective, LCA was conducted to identify unobserved (latent) classes based on the categorical indicators described 31 . LCA assigns each participant a ‘best’ class assignment based on their probability of belonging to each class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%