The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118257227.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Linguistic Variation and Change: Types and Computational Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These obstacles in the historical sociolinguistic practice have largely been overcome thanks to the assistance of Corpus Linguistics, Computational Linguistics and Social History, which have conferred empirical reliability upon the discipline (see Nevalainen & Raumolin-Brunberg 2003 Cantos & Sánchez 2000;Cantos 2012). The compilation of large electronic corpora (both computerdriven and research-driven) -containing collections of naturally occurring language data -has also been highly instrumental in overcoming some of the problems inherent to working with 'bad data' from the past and the historical paradox Bauer 2002;Schneider 2002;Bergs 2007b;Baker 2010;Murphy 2010;or Cantos 2012or Cantos , 2013.…”
Section: Historical Sociolinguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These obstacles in the historical sociolinguistic practice have largely been overcome thanks to the assistance of Corpus Linguistics, Computational Linguistics and Social History, which have conferred empirical reliability upon the discipline (see Nevalainen & Raumolin-Brunberg 2003 Cantos & Sánchez 2000;Cantos 2012). The compilation of large electronic corpora (both computerdriven and research-driven) -containing collections of naturally occurring language data -has also been highly instrumental in overcoming some of the problems inherent to working with 'bad data' from the past and the historical paradox Bauer 2002;Schneider 2002;Bergs 2007b;Baker 2010;Murphy 2010;or Cantos 2012or Cantos , 2013.…”
Section: Historical Sociolinguisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%