2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in blended learning courses and the functional value perceived by students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online teaching and learning platforms were anticipated to facilitate access to quality higher education and expand access to knowledge. 18 However, a study conducted by Mpungose 19 shows that only a few students had access to the online learning platform. This hindered their transition from contact learning to remote learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online teaching and learning platforms were anticipated to facilitate access to quality higher education and expand access to knowledge. 18 However, a study conducted by Mpungose 19 shows that only a few students had access to the online learning platform. This hindered their transition from contact learning to remote learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With strong self-e cacy or satisfaction, students may feel voluntary to receive blended instruction and keep regular engagement in blended learning programs. To improve students' engagement, MOOCs could be used as a form to blend face-to-face courses (de Moura, de Souza, & Viana, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies (Golonka et al, 2014 ; Yang and Dai, 2015 ; Zhai, 2017 ), the definitions of Icourse and Pigai are presented in Table 1 . Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are often criticized for high dropout rates and low student engagement (Gilliland et al, 2018 ; de Moura et al, 2021 ). Icourse, as a SPOC platform, is claimed to be a valid alternative as course designers, usually course lecturers, permit the course syllabus to be flexible in difficulty and more adaptable to different student characteristics (Ruiz-Palmero et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%