2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
129
2
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
19
129
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Esta revisión sistemática de la literatura parte de los enfoques sistemáticos y narrativos como una alternativa a las revisiones meta-analíticas y tradicionales (Okoli & Schabram, 2010). Por revisión sistemática se entiende el proceso de identificación, selección y síntesis de estudios de investigación primarios para proporcionar una imagen completa y actual del tema de estudio (Crompton, Burke, & Gregory, 2017). En este artículo la revisión tiene como objetivo proporcionar una panorámica completa de los usos educativos del término alfabetización transmedia (transmedia literacy).…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…Esta revisión sistemática de la literatura parte de los enfoques sistemáticos y narrativos como una alternativa a las revisiones meta-analíticas y tradicionales (Okoli & Schabram, 2010). Por revisión sistemática se entiende el proceso de identificación, selección y síntesis de estudios de investigación primarios para proporcionar una imagen completa y actual del tema de estudio (Crompton, Burke, & Gregory, 2017). En este artículo la revisión tiene como objetivo proporcionar una panorámica completa de los usos educativos del término alfabetización transmedia (transmedia literacy).…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…Whilst an entire issue was devoted to TPACK in AJET (Harris et al, 2017), thereby increasing the instance of the keyword and phrase occurring, this also reflects a growing international research trend (e.g., Marin et al, 2018;Rosenberg & Koehler, 2015). "Mobile learning" was also a new key phrase in the abstract analysis, which is not surprising given the rise of mobile learning internationally (Crompton, Burke, & Gregory, 2017;Crompton, Burke, Gregory, & Gräbe, 2016;Krull & Duart, 2017). However, "mobile learning" was listed explicitly as a keyword in only 4% of articles, with "handheld devices" accounting for 7% of articles; a trend also found in CAE (Zawacki-Richter & Latchem, 2018).…”
Section: Keyword and Abstract Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These topics also strongly featured in the most cited articles published across 2013-2017 (Table 9). It is interesting to note that the article by Beckers, Dolmans, and van Merriënboer (2016) reflects a recent trend in educational technology towards conducting systematic reviews (e.g., Clark, Tanner-Smith, & Killingsworth, 2016;Crompton et al, 2017;Joksimovic et al, 2017). Examining pre-service teachers' design capacities for web-based twenty-first century new culture of learning Table 9 Most cited articles published in AJET 2013AJET -2017 …”
Section: Citation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faber & Visscher, 2016) since the application shows students their mistakes and immediately adapts the difficulty of the assignments to what a person shows to be capable of. So-called mobile-learning studies with a focus on these possibilities of educational applications showed positive overall group effects (Crompton et al, 2017;Sung et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2011). This study casts new light on the effects of mobile-learning, since it illustrates that digital feedback does not replace teacher-student interactions about mistakes and underlying problems.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M-learning has been mostly studied by means of surveys and experimental methods with a focus on effectiveness (Crompton, Burke & Gregory, 2017;Wu et al, 2011). The majority of the in reviews included M-learning studies showed positive overall group effects (Crompton et al, 2017;Sung et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2011). How the use of these applications affects classroom interaction in which a teacher discusses learning with individual students has not been studied before.…”
Section: Educational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%