Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Kinematic alignment (KA) in the short to medium term clinical outcomes is superior to the mechanical alignment (MA), but whether it will improve patients’ postoperative gait is still controversial. Understanding whether and how KA influences postoperative gait mechanics could provide insights into optimizing alignment philosophy to improve functional outcomes. To investigate the impact of KA versus MA in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the operated and contralateral native lower limbs by analyzing plantar pressure distribution during walking gait. This study was designed as a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Thirty-seven patients were included, nineteen underwent KA-TKA and eighteen underwent MA-TKA, each with a native knee in the contralateral limb. Pressure-sensitive insoles were used to collect plantar pressure distribution of both limbs simultaneously during walking defined as medial-lateral load ratio (MLR). Perioperative characteristics including radiographic metrics (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and clinical outcomes (Oxford Knee Scores (OKS)) were compared between the two groups pre-operatively and 2-year postoperatively. Significant differences were found in postoperative radiographic metrics, with KA showing better OKS 1 year postoperatively ( p = 0.021), lower mean HKA ( p = 0.009) and mMPTA ( p < 0.001). Other perioperative characteristics were similar between groups. In the pedobarographic analysis, the MA group demonstrated greater medial pressure distribution in forefoot compared to both the KA group ( p < 0.001) and the contralateral native knee ( p = 0.002). Besides, the MA group revealed a more lateral pressure distribution in rearfoot compared to the KA group ( p = 0.007) and the contralateral native knee ( p = 0.001). While there was no significant difference between KA and native group ( p = 0.064 and p = 0.802, respectively). KA offered advantages over MA in restoring a more physiologic plantar pressure distribution at two years postoperatively. These results underscore the potential clinical benefits of adopting KA techniques in TKA procedures. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-79566-x.
Kinematic alignment (KA) in the short to medium term clinical outcomes is superior to the mechanical alignment (MA), but whether it will improve patients’ postoperative gait is still controversial. Understanding whether and how KA influences postoperative gait mechanics could provide insights into optimizing alignment philosophy to improve functional outcomes. To investigate the impact of KA versus MA in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the operated and contralateral native lower limbs by analyzing plantar pressure distribution during walking gait. This study was designed as a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. Thirty-seven patients were included, nineteen underwent KA-TKA and eighteen underwent MA-TKA, each with a native knee in the contralateral limb. Pressure-sensitive insoles were used to collect plantar pressure distribution of both limbs simultaneously during walking defined as medial-lateral load ratio (MLR). Perioperative characteristics including radiographic metrics (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and clinical outcomes (Oxford Knee Scores (OKS)) were compared between the two groups pre-operatively and 2-year postoperatively. Significant differences were found in postoperative radiographic metrics, with KA showing better OKS 1 year postoperatively ( p = 0.021), lower mean HKA ( p = 0.009) and mMPTA ( p < 0.001). Other perioperative characteristics were similar between groups. In the pedobarographic analysis, the MA group demonstrated greater medial pressure distribution in forefoot compared to both the KA group ( p < 0.001) and the contralateral native knee ( p = 0.002). Besides, the MA group revealed a more lateral pressure distribution in rearfoot compared to the KA group ( p = 0.007) and the contralateral native knee ( p = 0.001). While there was no significant difference between KA and native group ( p = 0.064 and p = 0.802, respectively). KA offered advantages over MA in restoring a more physiologic plantar pressure distribution at two years postoperatively. These results underscore the potential clinical benefits of adopting KA techniques in TKA procedures. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-79566-x.
The feet are complex structures that transmit loads transferred by other parts of the body to the ground and are involved in many static and dynamic activities, such as standing and walking. The contact area and pressure changes between the feet and the ground surface can be measured using pedobarographic devices. With pedobarographic examinations, it is possible to obtain a wide range of information needed to support clinical evaluation and diagnostic tests in physical medicine and rehabilitation practice. Foot structure and function, postural stability, lower extremity biomechanics, and gait analysis are among the areas that can be further investigated using pedobarography.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.