Understanding Tuberculosis - Global Experiences and Innovative Approaches to the Diagnosis 2012
DOI: 10.5772/29734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Phage for Detection, Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing and Enumeration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Number of cells added to each sample was determined using the phage amplification enumeration method described by Rees and Botsaris (). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… Number of cells added to each sample was determined using the phage amplification enumeration method described by Rees and Botsaris (). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enumeration of mycobacterial cells present in laboratory cultures was performed using a modification of the phage amplification assay which included serial dilution of the samples prior to plating, and the number of viable mycobacteria cells detected was reported as pfu ml ‐1 . For detailed schematics, see Rees and Botsaris ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard FPTB assay positive and negative controls were used each time the assay was performed. Enumeration of MAP cells in inocula was determined using the modification of the FPTB assay as described by Rees and Botsaris (2012) which involves diluting samples until countable numbers of plaques are obtained (data reported as pfu ml − 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection and enumeration testing was carried out according to Rees and Botsaris (). Briefly, to perform the phage amplification assay, cell culture samples (200 μL) was mixed with 800‐μL Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with ADC and CaCl 2 (2 mmol/L).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%