2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of positron emission tomography in detecting hepatoblastoma recurrence—a cautionary tale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gold standard to detect hepatoblastoma recurrence is elevated levels of a-fetoprotein (AFP). Wong et al performed FDG-PET imaging along with measurement of AFP during post-treatment follow-up and the conclusion made was that PET may be useful to find recurrence but caution must be taken in the interpretation of positive results [60]. Mody et al performed 11 FDG PET scans on seven children with pathologically proven hepatic malignancies for staging (one patient) or restaging (six patients) and concluded that PET scan is probably most useful for assessing response to therapy, in following AFP-negative cases and for detecting metastatic disease but large prospective studies are needed to establish it fully [61].…”
Section: Hepatoblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gold standard to detect hepatoblastoma recurrence is elevated levels of a-fetoprotein (AFP). Wong et al performed FDG-PET imaging along with measurement of AFP during post-treatment follow-up and the conclusion made was that PET may be useful to find recurrence but caution must be taken in the interpretation of positive results [60]. Mody et al performed 11 FDG PET scans on seven children with pathologically proven hepatic malignancies for staging (one patient) or restaging (six patients) and concluded that PET scan is probably most useful for assessing response to therapy, in following AFP-negative cases and for detecting metastatic disease but large prospective studies are needed to establish it fully [61].…”
Section: Hepatoblastomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one patient, intense uptake was due to necrotizing granulomas [17]. Another important study is that of Wong et al [15], who suggest caution in the interpretation of PET studies due to the risk of false positive results. In this retrospective article including sixteen children, three posttreatment patients had PET results suggestive of tumor recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 2 patients underwent further liver resections because of mildly raised α -FP levels. The histology results showed regenerative liver tissue only in both patients with no hepatoblastoma recurrence [15]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[27,29] However, caution must be taken in interpretation of positive results, as false positive results do occur due to inflammatory processes like necrotizing granuloma and also due to regenerative liver tissue. [30] These tumors being rare, many more prospective multicenter studies are necessary to determine the true clinical utility of FDG-PET imaging in the management of children with primary hepatic malignancies.…”
Section: Lymphomasmentioning
confidence: 99%