2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12014-021-09316-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of proteomics for blood biomarker research in premature infants: a scoping review

Abstract: Over the last decade, the use of proteomics in the setting of prematurity has increased and has enabled researchers to successfully identify biomarkers for an array of associated morbidities. The objective of this scoping review was to identify the existing literature, as well as any knowledge gaps related to proteomic biomarker discoveries in the setting of prematurity. A scoping review was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Medline databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a 2021 review of proteomic studies that attempted to identify biomarkers for prematurity-related diseases, Letunica et al determined that only 13% of studies investigated cord blood even though cord blood is a readily available specimen at birth. 11 Suski et al investigated the cord blood proteome of preterm infants in three GA groups (<=26 weeks, 27-28 weeks, and 29-30 weeks) and compared them to the proteomes of a full term control group. They reported differences in inflammatory, immunomodulation, coagulation, and complement systems in preterm versus term infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a 2021 review of proteomic studies that attempted to identify biomarkers for prematurity-related diseases, Letunica et al determined that only 13% of studies investigated cord blood even though cord blood is a readily available specimen at birth. 11 Suski et al investigated the cord blood proteome of preterm infants in three GA groups (<=26 weeks, 27-28 weeks, and 29-30 weeks) and compared them to the proteomes of a full term control group. They reported differences in inflammatory, immunomodulation, coagulation, and complement systems in preterm versus term infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…determined that only 13% of studies investigated cord blood even though cord blood is a readily available specimen at birth. 11 Suski et al investigated the cord blood proteome of preterm infants in three GA groups (<=26 weeks, 27-28 weeks, and 29-30 weeks) and compared them to the proteomes of a full term control group. They reported differences in inflammatory, immunomodulation, coagulation, and complement systems in preterm versus term infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the timing of baseline measurements was variable relative to the time from birth and other associated exposures, the ∼8-hour baseline measurement window relative to birth more accurately mimics real-world clinical scenarios, which increases the translatability of the results. With respect to intra-uterine exposures in particular, cord blood sampling for potential biomarkers remains an important area that was not explored in the PENUT trial [ [65] , [66] , [67] , [68] , [69] ]. Our study was also not powered to examine multiple combinations of biomarkers at multiple timepoints and their associations with long-term outcomes, and we were unable to compare the prognostic accuracy of individual biomarkers against other tools such as the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP-II) and SNAP-Perinatal Extension-II (SNAPPE-II) scores as not all the necessary markers were routinely available [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%