2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of questionnaire and virtual reality in the verification of the human factors issues in the design of nuclear control desk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows one to shorten the VR exposure and is the advantage of the proposed methodology over research involving only VR. [ 10 , 11 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows one to shorten the VR exposure and is the advantage of the proposed methodology over research involving only VR. [ 10 , 11 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibility of testing the human–machine system in the virtual environment limits the costs of such studies and is much safer to perform. Also Luquetti dos Santos et al [ 11 ] indicated that VR can be successfully used in designing a nuclear control desk. According to Luquetti dos Santos et al, human factor issues in designing nuclear control desks can be verified by experts using virtual models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in which user involvement concentrated on the evaluation were reported by dos Santos et al (dos Santos et al, 2009), Hwang et al (Hwang et al, 2009), and Rajala and Väyrynen (Rajala & Väyrynen, 2011). Dos Santos et al (dos Santos et al, 2009) report on another study relevant in the context of nuclear installations and design of control room systems. Even though the focus in this study is more on the evaluation than the design of equipment, it was carried out through a participatory ergonomics approach.…”
Section: Studies Concerning System Evaluation With End Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the accident at TMI, a critical review of plant design in several countries, with respect to the control room, was conducted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Human Factors was considered in a much broader sense and a chapter 18 was included in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) of the nuclear power plants, addressing Human Factors engineering (HFE) issues (Luquetti dos Santos et al, 2009). However, the Human Factors by this time of TMI accident was mistaken understood just as the individual factors, it means, the individual issues of the workers.…”
Section: Safety-i and Safety-ii Concepts -Human Factors Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%