2008
DOI: 10.1080/09500790802307837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Randomisation in Educational Research and Evaluation: A Critical Analysis of Underlying Assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well recognized that conducting a randomized controlled study in an educational context is a method to uncover the impact of instruction on students' outcomes but also that an RCT presents challenges for researchers and participants (Kyriakides & Creemers, 2017). The RCT design is consequently more seldomly used in school-based research due to difficulties associated with implementing random assignment and because the experiment falls short of explaining why an intervention is effective (Davies et al, 2008;Kyriakides & Creemers, 2017). A main argument to pursue a random allocation to groups lies in the potential to gain valid results of program effectiveness (Shadish et al, 2002), which can inform practice of what works.…”
Section: Methodological Considerations With the Rct Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that conducting a randomized controlled study in an educational context is a method to uncover the impact of instruction on students' outcomes but also that an RCT presents challenges for researchers and participants (Kyriakides & Creemers, 2017). The RCT design is consequently more seldomly used in school-based research due to difficulties associated with implementing random assignment and because the experiment falls short of explaining why an intervention is effective (Davies et al, 2008;Kyriakides & Creemers, 2017). A main argument to pursue a random allocation to groups lies in the potential to gain valid results of program effectiveness (Shadish et al, 2002), which can inform practice of what works.…”
Section: Methodological Considerations With the Rct Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During these trying times when schoolchildren are confined within their homes, we believe that everyone deserves access to any intervention strategy. Moreover, while the random assignment is considered to be the most robust method for determining the impact of a particular treatment (Alferes, 2012 ; Shadish & Ragsdale, 1996 ), it is rarely possible in educational research (Davies et al, 2008 ). Fortunately, Edmonds and Kennedy ( 2017 ) asserted that a switching-replications experimental design works well for researching educational interventions where learning events are repeated at standard intervals throughout the year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicated a response rate of 95%. The use of 38 respondents for the quantitative study was deemed appropriate considering the research topic, population and the purpose of the study (Davies, Williams & Yanchar, 2004). Altunişik, Coşkun, Bayraktaroğlu and Yildirim (2004) as cited in Delice (2010) argue that a sample size ranging from 30 to 500 at 95% confidence interval is good for a quantitative study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%