2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of scale independent shape measures to assess open stope performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cavity performance consists of comparing the resulting void from rock breakage versus the designed, planned volume. The conventional parameters used to assess stope mining performance quantify and minimise two parameters, dilution and ore loss (Cepuritis 2011;Villaescusa 2014). Dilution is a portion of the rock blasted within a design that has no economic benefit, and ore loss is a portion of the ore included in a particular design that did not break.…”
Section: Drawbell Performance Assessment Based On Cavity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cavity performance consists of comparing the resulting void from rock breakage versus the designed, planned volume. The conventional parameters used to assess stope mining performance quantify and minimise two parameters, dilution and ore loss (Cepuritis 2011;Villaescusa 2014). Dilution is a portion of the rock blasted within a design that has no economic benefit, and ore loss is a portion of the ore included in a particular design that did not break.…”
Section: Drawbell Performance Assessment Based On Cavity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the conventional performance calculations are usually undertaken to analyse excavation walls (Cepuritis 2011). However, for drawbells, this may be unsuitable due to the likely shadow effects and the muckpile zone conditions shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Drawbell Performance Assessment Based On Cavity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%