2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of soil-flushing to remediate metal contamination in a smelting slag dumping area: Column and pilot-scale experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The efficiency with which water removed heavy metals was related to soil type and heavy metal form (Navarro and Martínez 2010). In our experiment, the removal rates of Pb and Zn by water were only 0.71 % and 1.25 %, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…1. The efficiency with which water removed heavy metals was related to soil type and heavy metal form (Navarro and Martínez 2010). In our experiment, the removal rates of Pb and Zn by water were only 0.71 % and 1.25 %, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The second case, surfactant-aided soil flushing (SASF), is based on dragging of pollutants through the soil by the movement of a flushing fluid. Two different technologies can be distinguished within this area: conventional soil flushing (SASCF) [5][6][7][8][9][10] and electrokinetic soil flushing (SASEF) [11][12][13][14][15]. The main difference between these approaches is the driving force, which in the first case is the pressure gradient between the injection site of the flushing fluid and the fluid extraction site, and in the second case is a voltage gradient between rows of electrodes located in electrolyte wells in the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown, however, that foundry slag may be more reactive than previously thought and may be a source of heavy metal contamination in surface water, soil and groundwater [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%