1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(96)01161-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of sources emitting coincident gamma-rays for the determination of photopeak and total efficiencies in non-point-source counting geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative number of events expected in the sum peak depends on the decay scheme, the branching ratio of the two γ-rays, the angular correlations that may exist between them, source activity, and full energy peak efficiencies, corresponding to γ-ray energies. A complete analysis is often quite complex (see for example (Gilmore (2011); Debertin and Schötzig (1979); Helmer and Debertin (1988); Blaauw et al (1997); Sima and Arnold (2000))), but the following simplified derivations illustrate the general approach that can be applied. For the simplified decay scheme for 60 Co shown in Figure 1 we can estimate the expected number of events in the sum peak.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative number of events expected in the sum peak depends on the decay scheme, the branching ratio of the two γ-rays, the angular correlations that may exist between them, source activity, and full energy peak efficiencies, corresponding to γ-ray energies. A complete analysis is often quite complex (see for example (Gilmore (2011); Debertin and Schötzig (1979); Helmer and Debertin (1988); Blaauw et al (1997); Sima and Arnold (2000))), but the following simplified derivations illustrate the general approach that can be applied. For the simplified decay scheme for 60 Co shown in Figure 1 we can estimate the expected number of events in the sum peak.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%