2010
DOI: 10.1080/17457821003768422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of space-time to construct identity and context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying an event as a unit of analysis depends on establishing fixities – on who is present and where they are, and this contributes to a sense of context as something in which literacies occur. However, seeing context as a ‘static container’ (Burgess, ) is problematic. It may be more appropriate to see it ‘as a dynamic process of contextualisation in which language and context continuously co‐construct each other’ (Burgess, , p. 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identifying an event as a unit of analysis depends on establishing fixities – on who is present and where they are, and this contributes to a sense of context as something in which literacies occur. However, seeing context as a ‘static container’ (Burgess, ) is problematic. It may be more appropriate to see it ‘as a dynamic process of contextualisation in which language and context continuously co‐construct each other’ (Burgess, , p. 19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, seeing context as a ‘static container’ (Burgess, ) is problematic. It may be more appropriate to see it ‘as a dynamic process of contextualisation in which language and context continuously co‐construct each other’ (Burgess, , p. 19). If this is worthwhile in the study of literacies associated with digital technologies, we suggest that it is equally applicable to other literacy practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(I explain these categories in Section 4 below, in relation to my data.) In parallel with this Ivanič and I developed the framework presented in Burgess and Ivanič (2010) (see below) through extended discussion of the significance of time and timescales for the discoursal construction of identity, and of the implications of this theoretical link for data generated by our own research on writing in a variety of contexts (see for example Burgess, 2008Burgess, , 2010aBurgess, , 2010bIvanic, 2005Ivanic, , 2006Ivanic et al, 2009). I subsequently used the updated framework to re-analyse data about a specific act of writing by one student and it is the findings of that analysis which I discuss here.…”
Section: Research Context Data and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Through the evocation of landscape, Massey argues for space "imbued with time", that "could be imagined as provisionally intertwined simultaneities of ongoing, unfinished, stories" (2006: 46). This theorisation of space has informed a body of work uncovering the dynamics of identity construction through analysis of "space-time" relations (Burgess, 2010), specifically, the centrality of space and place in representations and formations of classed identities (Skeggs, 2004). Skeggs (2004) highlights the embodied connections between people and place, where place is inscribed onto the bodies of the people who inhabit it, a mark which they carry as a signifier of their "valuelessness", a placing visible on their body beyond the landscape of their place.…”
Section: Theorising Community: Identity and Place In Post-structural Thoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%