2021
DOI: 10.3390/foods10071671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of SPME-GC-MS IR and Raman Techniques for Botanical and Geographical Authentication and Detection of Adulteration of Honey

Abstract: The aim of this review is to describe the chromatographic, spectrometric, and spectroscopic techniques applied to honey for the determination of botanical and geographical origin and detection of adulteration. Based on the volatile profile of honey and using Solid Phase microextraction-Gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS) analytical technique, botanical and geographical characterization of honey can be successfully determined. In addition, the use of vibrational spectroscopic techniques, in partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(220 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [ 23 , 24 ], near-infrared (NIR) [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], fluorescence [ 29 ], and ultraviolet (UV) [ 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] spectroscopies, among others, have been widely employed as fingerprinting methodologies to address honey authenticity issues and to prevent and detect frauds. Chromatographic fingerprinting using both liquid chromatography and gas chromatography (for the analysis of non-volatile and volatile compounds, respectively), often coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), has also been described for the characterization and authentication of honey [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [ 23 , 24 ], near-infrared (NIR) [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], fluorescence [ 29 ], and ultraviolet (UV) [ 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] spectroscopies, among others, have been widely employed as fingerprinting methodologies to address honey authenticity issues and to prevent and detect frauds. Chromatographic fingerprinting using both liquid chromatography and gas chromatography (for the analysis of non-volatile and volatile compounds, respectively), often coupled with mass spectrometry (MS), has also been described for the characterization and authentication of honey [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honey is another matrix well studied by GC. It has been demonstrated in several works [26,34,35] that the volatile fraction of honey is strongly related to its floral origin. This raises substantial interest, most of all from a commercial point of view, because honey produced from a single plant (or at least having a higher percentage of pollen of a single plant) has generally a higher commercial value than "multifloral" honeys that are more common but present a poorer taste.…”
Section: Gas Chromatography (Gc) and Chemometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman and FTIR analyses were also used for the adulterant [130,131] and authenticity analyses of various honeys [18,131,132]. For instance, Raman spectroscopy combined with air PLS-LDA was successfully applied for adulterant detection in honey, such as high fructose corn syrup and maltose syrup, where the Raman spectroscopy fluorescence background was reduced by the PLS pretreatment [133].…”
Section: Honey Characterization Through Spectroscopic Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%