Research synthesis and meta-analysis provide a pathway to bring together findings in a given domain with greater systematicity, objectivity, and transparency than traditional reviews. The same techniques and corresponding benefits can be and have been applied to examine methodological practices in second language (L2) research (e.g., Plonsky, 2013). In the first half of this paper, we integrate findings, trends, and critiques from a number of syntheses to both illustrate the potential of this approach and to promote more methodologically informed research practices. Our emphasis here is on study designs and sampling practices. In the second half, we provide an example of a methodological synthesis that reviews the use of one particular statistical technique as applied in L2 research: exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Here and throughout the chapter, we provide specific recommendations for primary research as well as for future efforts to synthesize methodological practices in the field.Keywords research synthesis; meta-analysis; research methods; factor analysis
IntroductionResearch synthesis and meta-analysis comprise techniques that can improve on traditional literature reviews in many ways. Namely, these procedures provide enhanced levels of systematicity, objectivity, and transparency, thus also providing a fuller and more precise description of effects across studies in a particular domain.The same benefits resulting from the set of procedures that make up the synthetic process (e.g., locating primary studies, coding for features and effects; Plonsky and Gonulal Methodological Reviews and a Case Study of EFA see Plonsky & Oswald, in press) are by no means limited to addressing substantive questions. A synthetic approach can also be employed fruitfully to describe and evaluate methodological phenomena. A small but growing number of such reviews of second language (L2) research have appeared in recent years, both independent of and in conjunction with meta-analyses (i.e., systematic reviews involving the aggregation of effect sizes). This line of research employs synthetic methods to describe and evaluate the presence of research and reporting practices in a given domain, whether broadly or narrowly conceived. In parallel to primary research, synthetic studies of this type treat primary studies as participants that are surveyed to collect methodologically oriented data.The first half of this chapter presents findings from studies related to methodological practices in quantitative L2 research as observed in syntheses covering a variety of subdomains within the field. Our objective here and throughout is to bring together findings, trends, and critiques from methodological syntheses to both illustrate the potential of this set of techniques and to promote more methodologically informed research practices. In the second half, we provide a detailed example of such a review focusing on the use of EFA in L2 research. This study, unlike most others reviewed in this chapter, is not limited to any particular substant...