2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of sun elevation angle for stereogrammetric boreal forest height in open canopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neigh et al (2014) characterized the canopy height of forest stands, using stereo images, at three different locations, including the Harvard Forest in Central Massachusetts, Jamison in Central South Carolina and Hoquiam on the central west coast of Washington State [12]. Montesano et al (2017) mapped the stereogrammetric height of the boreal forest using high resolution spaceborne imagery, acquired by Digital Globe's Worldview-1, and Worldview-2 satellites [13]. Ni et al (2014) analyzed the features of point clouds synthesized from multi-view ALOS/PRISM data [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neigh et al (2014) characterized the canopy height of forest stands, using stereo images, at three different locations, including the Harvard Forest in Central Massachusetts, Jamison in Central South Carolina and Hoquiam on the central west coast of Washington State [12]. Montesano et al (2017) mapped the stereogrammetric height of the boreal forest using high resolution spaceborne imagery, acquired by Digital Globe's Worldview-1, and Worldview-2 satellites [13]. Ni et al (2014) analyzed the features of point clouds synthesized from multi-view ALOS/PRISM data [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned studies have demonstrated that it was feasible to extract forest canopy heights from point clouds of the spaceborne stereoscopic imagery. However, the quality of the point cloud is largely determined by the observation geometry [13] and image resolutions, and could also be affected by cloud cover, topographic shadowing, and other factors affecting the light environment (diffuse versus direct lighting) [15]. The spaceborne photogrammetric missions work on different observation geometry and image resolutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montesano et al [12] combined stereo WorldView-1 images (0.46 m ground sampling distance) and ICESat-GLAS waveforms [22] to estimate the height of trees in northern Siberia with a RMSE varying from 0.85 to 1.37 m. In this case, the Worldview-1 imagery was used only to assess the ground-level elevations, not the top of the trees. Later for the same region, Montesano et al [6] used WorldView-1 and -2 stereo-images to reconstruct both the ground and vegetation elevations using the image matching algorithm of the AMES stereo pipeline of NASA [23]. By comparing results obtained from imagery acquired with sun elevations varying from 7° to 43°, they found that the highest accuracy for the DTM reconstruction was achieved in high sun Since 1999, with the launch of the IKONOS sensor [17], earth observation from space can supply images having a ground sampling distance of 1 m or less.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some authors [2,3] distinguished three zones from south to north (approximately 50 ‱ to 70 ‱ north) which they called respectively closed-canopy boreal forests, open canopy woodlands and forest-tundra. Others have more recently defined LW as an ecotone stretching between closed canopy boreal forests and tundra [4][5][6], i.e., a boreal-arctic transition. We will here adopt the latter definition and consider the LW as having a geographical distribution in Canada and Alaska as presented in the map proposed in Reference [4] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These passive optical data have similar spectral wavelengths to Landsat (visible and near infrared channels), but they have important fundamental differences due to image acquisition characteristics. The differences can be seen as limitations, as sun‐sensor geometry, pixel resolution, and irregular image extent, but these observations can also provide new features to exploit (Montesano et al, ). Methods that capitalize on the new features of these data will provide a means for resolving detailed patterns of vertical and horizontal vegetation structure across remote portions of the boreal forest (Montesano et al, ).…”
Section: Observing Properties Of the Abz Landmentioning
confidence: 99%