2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00270.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of taxonomic distinctness indices in assessing patterns of biodiversity in modular organisms

Abstract: Estimating diversity of modular organisms may be problematic due to actual difficulties in discriminating between ‘individuals’ and quantifying their abundances. Quantitative data, when available, are collected through methods that could preclude the application of classical diversity indices, making comparisons among studies difficult. Taxonomic distinctness indices, such as the ‘Average Taxonomic Distinctness’ (Δ+) and the ‘Variation in Taxonomic Distinctness’ (Λ+) may represent suitable tools in investigati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Species in environment-rich systems will likely occupy a wider range of ecological niches than species inhabiting systems with less environmental heterogeneity (Baldi, 2008;Connor and McCoy, 1979), which might explain the decreasing gradient of taxonomic sufficiency as we move from "species-poor" ecosystems towards "species-rich" ones. It is worth mentioning that although the ARI values decrease in these large ecosystems, the range of absolute values is still highly satisfactory and comparable to other studies (Bevilacqua et al, 2009;Soares-Gomes et al, 2012;Wlodarska-Kowalczuk and Kedra, 2007).…”
Section: Different Ecosystems and Spatial Scales Similar Responsessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Species in environment-rich systems will likely occupy a wider range of ecological niches than species inhabiting systems with less environmental heterogeneity (Baldi, 2008;Connor and McCoy, 1979), which might explain the decreasing gradient of taxonomic sufficiency as we move from "species-poor" ecosystems towards "species-rich" ones. It is worth mentioning that although the ARI values decrease in these large ecosystems, the range of absolute values is still highly satisfactory and comparable to other studies (Bevilacqua et al, 2009;Soares-Gomes et al, 2012;Wlodarska-Kowalczuk and Kedra, 2007).…”
Section: Different Ecosystems and Spatial Scales Similar Responsessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Δ + represents the average taxonomic path length between two randomly chosen species in the taxonomic tree, whereas Λ + reflects the unevenness in the taxonomic tree of a given species’ list and represents the variance of these pair-wise path lengths. The indices are independent of the number of species in a sample and thus represent useful tools for analysing historical data (Bevilacqua et al 2009 ). A reference list, from species to subclass, was made including all NSH species recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of these indexes is still restricted in the marine environment. To date, they have essentially been employed in environmental impact assessments (Bevilacqua et al, 2009), with the assumption that disturbed assemblages are taxonomically poorer than undisturbed assemblages (Warwick & Clarke, 1995). The application of the combination of AvTD and VarTD may enable a robust summary of the patterns of taxonomic relatedness within the assemblage to be obtained (Clarke & Warwick, 2001) based on the uniformity of the taxon distribution within a hierarchical taxonomic tree (Xiujuan et al, 2010).…”
Section: ________________mentioning
confidence: 99%