“…The limitations of the functionality of a range of devices have been highlighted; for example, the coverage (especially in rural areas), portability, reliability, range, size, ease of use, natural barriers and obstructions in the environment, availability and reliability of electronic networks, the need for multiple pieces of equipment, attenuation from clothing or other worn items, electronic interference, the need for regular testing, battery replacement, the involvement of a service center, and finally, the need in some cases to recognize that a person has in fact eloped (see Altus et al, 2000;Bantry White et al, 2010;Baptiste et al, 2006;Faucounau et al, 2009;Hodgkinson et al, 2007;Kearns et al, 2007;McShane et al, 1998;Miskelly, 2005;National Autism Association, 2012;Niemeijer & Hertogh, 2008;Niemeijer et al, 2010;Perry et al, 2009;Rasquin, Willems, de Vlieger, Geers, & Soede, 2007;University of Toronto, 2012;Williams et al, 2011). Rialle, Ollivet, Guigui, and Herve (2008) noted that there is no "average user" of tracking technology and, therefore, assessment of safety, individual factors of the person being monitored, the relationship between the person and carer, ease of operation, the size of the device and reliability of use (Bantry White et al, 2010) have all been proposed as necessary considerations for the selection of a GPS device.…”