2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of Tenckhoff Catheters for Draining of Symptomatic Lymphoceles: A Review of Literature and Our Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experience, laparoscopic internal drainage of lymphoceles was effective treatment consistent with other reports . We also used Tenckhoff catheter for recurrent cases as reported by others . The surgical techniques used to reduce the risk of lymphoceles are surgical drains, prophylactic peritoneal fenestration, harmonic dissection during the preparation of recipient's blood vessels and surgical ligation of hilar lymphatics on the back table.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experience, laparoscopic internal drainage of lymphoceles was effective treatment consistent with other reports . We also used Tenckhoff catheter for recurrent cases as reported by others . The surgical techniques used to reduce the risk of lymphoceles are surgical drains, prophylactic peritoneal fenestration, harmonic dissection during the preparation of recipient's blood vessels and surgical ligation of hilar lymphatics on the back table.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…8,31,32 We also used Tenckhoff catheter for recurrent cases as reported by others. 33,34 The surgical techniques used to reduce the risk of lymphoceles are surgical drains, 10 prophylactic peritoneal fenestration, 35 harmonic dissection during the preparation of recipient's blood vessels 2 and surgical ligation of hilar lymphatics on the back table. Although we routinely drain all transplant wounds, we did not find any difference in volume of drain output nor the number of in situ days between the lymphocele and no-lymphocele groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El linfocele es una complicación que se llega a presentar con una frecuencia de hasta 50%; sin embargo, únicamente de 0.6 a 14.6% de los casos requieren tratamiento con una media de 5.88%, 1,2 la mayoría de las veces su origen proviene del receptor, aunque existen algunos factores de riesgo quirúrgicos y no quirúrgicos que están asociados a su aparición como son presencia de únicamente una arteria disección cruenta de las arterias iliacas, procuración laparoscópica de donante vivo, episodio de rechazo agudo, diabetes, obesidad, función retardada del injerto, y uso de fármacos inhibidores de mTor como sirolimus, entra otras. [3][4][5] Rev Mex Traspl. 2023; 12 (2): 110-111 www.medigraphic.com/trasplantes www.medigraphic.org.mx El diagnóstico de linfocele se basó generalmente en imágenes de ultrasonido.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified