2020
DOI: 10.1177/0032885520956334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use of the Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Model for Corrections Officers: Reducing Incidents within a County Jail

Abstract: This study presents an adaptation of the Crisis Intervention Team Model (CIT) to a jail setting. Pre-post surveys and interviews assessed changes in corrections officers’ (CO) knowledge of and attitudes toward mental health. Cell Removal Team (CRT) services assessed the impact of CIT on the use of this specialized unit. Results indicate positive changes in CO attitudes, increased de-escalation skills, and an abrupt decrease in the level of CRT usage, with results sustained in the 8-month follow-up period.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of eight studies (two dissertations) investigated the impacts of various training programs upon stigmatising attitudes of correctional staff (Brown et al, 2018; Canada et al, 2021; Comartin et al, 2020; Dy, 2014; Melnikov et al, 2017; Poland, 2010; Ramsden et al, 2014; Tomar et al, 2017). One study was assessed as being of high overall quality (Melnikov et al, 2017), four studies as medium overall quality (Canada et al, 2021; Comartin et al, 2020;Dy, 2014; Tomar et al, 2017) and three as low quality (Brown et al, 2018; Poland, 2010; Ramsden et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A total of eight studies (two dissertations) investigated the impacts of various training programs upon stigmatising attitudes of correctional staff (Brown et al, 2018; Canada et al, 2021; Comartin et al, 2020; Dy, 2014; Melnikov et al, 2017; Poland, 2010; Ramsden et al, 2014; Tomar et al, 2017). One study was assessed as being of high overall quality (Melnikov et al, 2017), four studies as medium overall quality (Canada et al, 2021; Comartin et al, 2020;Dy, 2014; Tomar et al, 2017) and three as low quality (Brown et al, 2018; Poland, 2010; Ramsden et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study involved an RCT with a control group that did not receive any intervention (Poland, 2010). One study with a pre‐ and post‐intervention study design involved a control group (Canada et al, 2021), while the other studies involved uncontrolled pre‐ and post‐intervention study designs (Brown et al, 2018; Comartin et al, 2020; Dy, 2014; Melnikov et al, 2017; Ramsden et al, 2014; Tomar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations