2015
DOI: 10.1515/pjs-2015-0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Use Of The Diep Flap In The Modern Reconstructive Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current tissue reconstruction strategies such as breast implants, lipofilling, and microsurgical-free tissue transplantation are the most often applied procedures for repairing soft tissue defects due to surgical resections such as mastectomy/lumpectomy, following breast cancer. However, there are numerous drawbacks associated with the current approaches, such as seroma (a localized accumulation of serous fluid), infection, the need for reintervention, flap necrosis, and fat resorption. As a result, new techniques, such as adipose tissue engineering (TE), need to be explored to ensure a successful reconstruction. The clinical need for tissue engineering is justified by several epidemiological studies highlighting the current clinical drawbacks .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current tissue reconstruction strategies such as breast implants, lipofilling, and microsurgical-free tissue transplantation are the most often applied procedures for repairing soft tissue defects due to surgical resections such as mastectomy/lumpectomy, following breast cancer. However, there are numerous drawbacks associated with the current approaches, such as seroma (a localized accumulation of serous fluid), infection, the need for reintervention, flap necrosis, and fat resorption. As a result, new techniques, such as adipose tissue engineering (TE), need to be explored to ensure a successful reconstruction. The clinical need for tissue engineering is justified by several epidemiological studies highlighting the current clinical drawbacks .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Poland approximately 50 free TRAM, DIEP and SIEA breast reconstructions are performed annually, and probably double that number in 2017 [15]. In contrast, in Germany, the annual number of free flaps for breast reconstruction is about 1200, including 200 in Duesseldorf, where reimbursement is more generous (unilateral DIEP -14,200 euro, bilateral DIEP-18,500 euro, free TRAM-9800 euro and pedicled TRAM-7500 euro) (Andree, personal communication).…”
Section: Authors' Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their first immediate face transplant and refinements of head and neck cancer reconstructions have had a high profile in recent years. Roughly speaking, in Poland 42 free TRAM, DIEP and SIEA breast reconstructions are performed annually [51] (also personal communication with Ulatowski -Medical Center for Postgraduate Education in Warsaw and Ulczok -Insitute of Oncology in Gliwice). Hopefully, these numbers will double in 2017.…”
Section: Polish Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%