2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000912000153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the Internet in collecting CDI data – an example from Norway

Abstract: This article presents the methodology used in a population-based study of early communicative development in Norwegian children using an adaptation of the MacArthur-Bates communicative development inventories (CDI), comprising approximately 6500 children aged between 0.8 and 3.0. To our knowledge, this is the first CDI study collecting data via the Internet. After a short description of the procedures used in adapting the CDI to Norwegian and the selection of participants, we discuss the advantages and potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concurrent validity was determined by assessing the relation between the CDI scores and child performance in spontaneous speech samples (along the lines of Kristoffersen et al, 2012). A comparison was made between the lexical items included in a lexicon based on spontaneously produced child speech (PLEX5 - Frota et al, 2012), and the words included in the EP-CDI SFs.…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrent validity was determined by assessing the relation between the CDI scores and child performance in spontaneous speech samples (along the lines of Kristoffersen et al, 2012). A comparison was made between the lexical items included in a lexicon based on spontaneously produced child speech (PLEX5 - Frota et al, 2012), and the words included in the EP-CDI SFs.…”
Section: Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that either parents over-report on their children's lexical development, or adults underestimate their own vocabulary in retrospect. The latter seems most likely, as the Norwegian CDI results have been found to be valid and reliable (Kristoffersen et al, 2013;Simonsen et al, 2014). 6 For the survey on AoA as well as for the survey on imageability, information was sent to The Norwegian Social Science Data Services, and the relevant permits were obtained.…”
Section: Subjective Age Of Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the parents' suggestions, a few words (for example pc) were added and some were removed; but, in all, this version of the CDI was only slightly revised. Before constructing the web-based forms used in the present study, however, we revised the forms again, this time aiming to bring the Norwegian adaptation as close as possible to the Danish adaptation, in order to facilitate cross-linguistic comparison between two closely related languages with comparable grammatical systems but with quite different phonologies (see Kristoffersen et al (2013) for details).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%