2018
DOI: 10.5540/03.2018.006.01.0441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the reverse Cuthill-McKee method with an alternative pseudo-peripheral vertice finder for profile optimization

Abstract: Abstract. The need to determine pseudo-peripheral vertices arises from several methods for ordering sparse matrix equations. This paper evaluates an alternative algorithm for finding such vertices based on the Kaveh-Bondarabady algorithm. Specifically, this paper evaluates a variation of this algorithm against the original algorithm and the George-Liu algorithm. Extensive experiments among these algorithms in conjunction with the reverse Cuthill-McKee method suggest that the modified algorithm is a suitable al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper analizes experimentally the George-Liu [10] and Kaveh-Bondarabady [19] algorithms for finding pseudoperipheral vertices along with a modified Kaveh-Bondarabady algorithm when applied in conjunction with the Reverse Cuthill-McKee method [11] for bandwidth reductions of matrices. This work is a revised and expanded version of a paper presented at the XXXVII Brazilian National Congress in Applied and Computational Mathematics (CNMAC 2017) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper analizes experimentally the George-Liu [10] and Kaveh-Bondarabady [19] algorithms for finding pseudoperipheral vertices along with a modified Kaveh-Bondarabady algorithm when applied in conjunction with the Reverse Cuthill-McKee method [11] for bandwidth reductions of matrices. This work is a revised and expanded version of a paper presented at the XXXVII Brazilian National Congress in Applied and Computational Mathematics (CNMAC 2017) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%