2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the technology in equitation science: A panacea or abductive science?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earlier model (Polar S810) has been validated in horses 44 , 45 and although Parker et al 44 found discrepancies existed during movement, both Parker et al 44 and Ille et al 45 found better agreement when the horse was static (as they were during the current study). Randle et al 46 proposed that recent technological improvements (i.e. the newer Polar V800) could improve the reliability of the data generated and Giles et al 47 demonstrated that (in humans) the V800 was indeed an improvement over the earlier models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earlier model (Polar S810) has been validated in horses 44 , 45 and although Parker et al 44 found discrepancies existed during movement, both Parker et al 44 and Ille et al 45 found better agreement when the horse was static (as they were during the current study). Randle et al 46 proposed that recent technological improvements (i.e. the newer Polar V800) could improve the reliability of the data generated and Giles et al 47 demonstrated that (in humans) the V800 was indeed an improvement over the earlier models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much debate surrounding the ethical use of the horse in sport, and when this use may become abuse (Campbell, 2013). The impact of training, competitive demands and management practices have been evaluated to differing extents (for example, Schmidt et al, 2010;Peeters et al, 2013;Yarnell et al, 2015), with the focus of many studies being on technological advances to measure the physical impact of specific pieces of equipment, the rider's actions and training methods (see Derksen and Clayton, 2007;Randle et al, 2017). There has been less focus on the development of methods for assessing the subjective experience of the horse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public opinion may be clouded by anthropomorphism or ignorance of the needs of different species, leading to emotional rather than objective decision-making. Unfortunately, limited objective evidence exists to justify many common practices used in horse sports that are currently perceived as detrimental by the public; for example, whip use [8][9][10]. Nevertheless, the Sporthorse Welfare Foundation agrees with Campbell [1] that the use of horses in sport is ethically justifiable, if an ethical framework can be applied to safeguard horse welfare by supporting stakeholders to make evidence-informed decisions on what should or should not be carried out in specific situations [8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%