1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00052-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of the wavelet transform to describe embolic signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In our study, the signals were reviewed by 2 observers, and for inclusion, both observers had to agree that the signal was a true embolic signal. The following definition for embolic signals was used: (1) typical visible, (2) short duration, (3) high-intensity signal, (4) within the Doppler spectrum, and (5) occurring at random within the cardiac cycle.…”
Section: Role Of Human Expertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In our study, the signals were reviewed by 2 observers, and for inclusion, both observers had to agree that the signal was a true embolic signal. The following definition for embolic signals was used: (1) typical visible, (2) short duration, (3) high-intensity signal, (4) within the Doppler spectrum, and (5) occurring at random within the cardiac cycle.…”
Section: Role Of Human Expertsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Previous attempts at producing an automated system for classifying HITS into artifacts or emboli have failed to achieve the same level of sensitivity (embolus detection) and specificity (artifact rejection) as the human expert, considered the current "gold standard." [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Without an automated embolic signal detection system that is as effective as the human expert in terms of sensitivity and specificity, embolus detection remains a time-consuming process, restricted to research studies and unsuitable for clinical practice. 25 To separate artifacts from emboli, the best compromise is dual-gate TCD, which consists of tracing the embolus at 2 different depths in the same artery (time delay) ( Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most widely used techniques for identifying non-repetitive and/or periodic patterns or distortions has been the wavelet transform [4][5].This technique adapts a wavelet pattern to the characteristics of the signal distortion to be identified.This has been used for identification of epileptic spikes in electroencephalography (EEG) signal [6][7][8][9], to identify emboli in the blood flow signal [10][11][12][13], to identify arrhythmias in the ECG signal [14][15][16], for identifying flaws in industrial materials (metals, concrete, etc. )in the ultrasound signal [17][18][19], and many other scenarios.…”
Section: Iirelated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence of short duration embolic signals invalidates this assumption. New analysis methods may be more suited to embolic signal detection (Fan and Evans, 1994;Aydin et al, 1999) but until these are further developed and widely accepted, processing of embolic signals will continue to be based on the FFT. In view of the potential difficulties in applying the FFT to processing such signals, it is important that signal processing parameters are optimized for embolic signals (Markus et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%