1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(96)80070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of tungsten carbide needle holders to remove intracanal objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical approach to management of such cases should be based on thorough knowledge of the success rate of each treatment option available and to inform the patient preoperatively of the options and risks of treatment as part of the consent procedure. Literature suggests that the fractured instruments can be removed by a variety of methods such as fine ultrasonic tips, micro-tubule devices and pliers/haemostatic forceps 10,11,12 . As removal of a fractured file is associated with considerable risk in a few cases, bypassing the fragment should also be considered a treatment option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical approach to management of such cases should be based on thorough knowledge of the success rate of each treatment option available and to inform the patient preoperatively of the options and risks of treatment as part of the consent procedure. Literature suggests that the fractured instruments can be removed by a variety of methods such as fine ultrasonic tips, micro-tubule devices and pliers/haemostatic forceps 10,11,12 . As removal of a fractured file is associated with considerable risk in a few cases, bypassing the fragment should also be considered a treatment option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is the risk of secondary incidents such as perforation occurring during the removal procedure. A number of methods and techniques have been proposed for retrieving such debris from root canals 8) , most of which utilize mechanical grasping techniques 9) . Such techniques, however, require the wall of the root canal to be extensively reduced to secure a large enough operative field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%