The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract

Background Medical journals use Twitter to engage and disseminate their research articles and implement a range of strategies to maximize reach and impact. Objective This study aims to systematically review the literature to synthesize and describe the different Twitter strategies used by medical journals and their effectiveness on journal impact and readership metrics. Methods A systematic search of the literature before February 2020 in four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) was conducted. Articles were reviewed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Results The search identified 44 original research studies that evaluated Twitter strategies implemented by medical journals and analyzed the relationship between Twitter metrics and alternative and citation-based metrics. The key findings suggest that promoting publications on Twitter improves citation-based and alternative metrics for academic medical journals. Moreover, implementing different Twitter strategies maximizes the amount of attention that publications and journals receive. The four key Twitter strategies implemented by many medical journals are tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. Each strategy was successful in promoting the publications. However, different metrics were used to measure success. Conclusions Four key Twitter strategies are implemented by medical journals: tweeting the title and link of the article, infographics, podcasts, and hosting monthly internet-based journal clubs. In this review, each strategy was successful in promoting publications but used different metrics to measure success. Thus, it is difficult to conclude which strategy is most effective. In addition, the four strategies have different costs and effects on dissemination and readership. We recommend that journals and researchers incorporate a combination of Twitter strategies to maximize research impact and capture audiences with a variety of learning methods.

‘Chop wood, carry water’ Dr Sharief Hendricks: an inspirational story of an impactful South African sports scientist

“…His work has informed safe coaching techniques and South African Rugby’s BokSmart injury intervention programme4 5 and, along with leading experts, produced a consensus document for video analysis in rugby 6. Sharief’s further research interest in science communication7 and stakeholder engagement8 is reflected in two leading science communication websites—HealthScienceReviews.com (https://healthsciencereviews.com) and RugbyScientists.com (https://rugbyscientists.com).…”

#Ophthalmology: Social Media Utilization and Impact in Ophthalmology Journals, Professional Societies, and Eye Health Organizations

“… 6 For peer-reviewed journals, social media represents an opportunity to engage with readership, share published articles, and facilitate discussion on the latest medical research, with previous studies suggesting that an active social media presence may contribute to increased research impact. 7 …”

“…6 For peer-reviewed journals, social media represents an opportunity to engage with readership, share published articles, and facilitate discussion on the latest medical research, with previous studies suggesting that an active social media presence may contribute to increased research impact. 7 While several studies have recently reported on social media usage in medical specialties including dermatology, orthopaedics, urology, and neurosurgery, information on the current state of social media utilization by ophthalmology peer-reviewed journals, professional societies, and/or eye health organizations remains limited. 6,[8][9][10] As recently as 2014, social media was infrequently utilized in medicine, limited in scope (platforms such as Instagram not yet widespread), and unpopular amongst older Americans.…”

The Twitter Accounts of Scientific Journals: A Dataset

“…They also found how interjournal communications can be detected within the same citation index but hardly across separate indices (Raamkumar et al, 2018). They identified the factors that determined 'successful' Tweets (Wadhwa et al, 2017) such as interactive user mentions (Robbins et al, 2019), infographics and online journal clubs (Erskine & Hendricks, 2021;Lasch & Heaton, 2022;Sarwal et al, 2022).…”