2019
DOI: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_54_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The use of uterine artery doppler indices for prediction of pre-eclampsia in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our rate of pre-eclampsia is similar to the 7% rate observed in Nigeria. 14 Eclampsia occurs nowadays in <1 out of 10,000 pregnancies in high-income countries, with its associated maternal mortality being <1%. 1 Our high rate of eclampsia may be explained by the poor follow up of women, exemplified by their usually late booking (Table 1) and the fact that the vast majority had <8 recommended visits, as recommended by WHO in 2016, 15 given that non-severe pre-eclampsia can progress rapidly to severe or to eclampsia, 16 as demonstrated in our survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our rate of pre-eclampsia is similar to the 7% rate observed in Nigeria. 14 Eclampsia occurs nowadays in <1 out of 10,000 pregnancies in high-income countries, with its associated maternal mortality being <1%. 1 Our high rate of eclampsia may be explained by the poor follow up of women, exemplified by their usually late booking (Table 1) and the fact that the vast majority had <8 recommended visits, as recommended by WHO in 2016, 15 given that non-severe pre-eclampsia can progress rapidly to severe or to eclampsia, 16 as demonstrated in our survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms utilize multiple maternal risk factors, radiological evaluations such as the uterine artery Doppler pulsatility index, and diverse plasma biomarkers to achieve their intended purpose. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Despite the rising efficacy of these approaches, the actual predictive models for gestational hypertension are still a source of contention and hence not yet used in routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%