2016
DOI: 10.1007/s41252-016-0005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usefulness of Implicit Measures for the Screening, Assessment and Treatment of Problematic Alcohol Use in Individuals with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability

Abstract: Although the neuropsychological underpinnings of problematic alcohol use have been studied extensively, this research has not yet been generalised to individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID). In this paper, we present the main findings of a research project aimed at studying the deficiencies in information processing associated with problematic alcohol use in problematic drinkers with and without MBID. The objectives were to develop and test indirect measures of cognitive biases and e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As I have argued in my previous paper (Van Duijvenbode et al 2017), and will argue again, pending the lines for future research I have summarized it is still too premature to implement implicit measures in clinical practice.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As I have argued in my previous paper (Van Duijvenbode et al 2017), and will argue again, pending the lines for future research I have summarized it is still too premature to implement implicit measures in clinical practice.…”
Section: Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This underlines the importance of evidence-based practice in the assessment and treatment of SUD-both in individuals with and without MBID (also see American Psychological Association 2002; European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction 2011; United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and World Health Organization 2016). As I have summarized in our paper (Van Duijvenbode et al 2017), the evidence base of implicit measures in the assessment and treatment of SUD in individuals with MBID is very limited to non-existent. After all, we did not find evidence of attentional or approach biases (which are Btrained away^in CBM) and executive dysfunctioning in problematic drinkers with MBID.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With great interest, I read the recent paper by Van Duijvenbode et al (2017) in this journal concerning the usefulness of implicit measures for the screening, assessment and treatment of problematic alcohol use in individuals with mild to borderline intellectual disability (MBID). Although I applaud the subject of the paper, I would argue that some of the conclusions are mistaken and could hinder progress in this important field of research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Duijvenbode et al (2017) do not recommend implementation of CBM in problem drinkers based on two critical reviews (Christiansen et al 2015;Field et al 2014) and a recent meta-analysis (Cristea et al 2016). However, the first two papers are critical about one specific type of CBM: attentional bias modification, and primarily note that there are as yet very few clinical studies to test the effectiveness of this method in a clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%