2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.943792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The usefulness of liquid-based cytology for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses

Abstract: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is used primarily for cervical cytology, although it is also used for analyzing liquid samples such as urine and ascites specimens, as well as fine needle aspiration material, such as those obtained from breast and thyroid. The usefulness of the LBC method for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) of solid pancreatic masses was recently reported. The LBC method can produce multiple pathological slides and can be applied to immunocytochemistry and genetic analyses.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, LBC enables multiple specimen preparation. Multiple samples can then be used for immunohistochemical and genetic examinations (38). The use of LBC in BCC cytodiagnosis is an interesting research gap.…”
Section: Liquid-based Cytology and Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, LBC enables multiple specimen preparation. Multiple samples can then be used for immunohistochemical and genetic examinations (38). The use of LBC in BCC cytodiagnosis is an interesting research gap.…”
Section: Liquid-based Cytology and Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytological examinations may also involve the evaluation of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) specimens. 61 In LBC, collected cells are suspended in a liquid medium, homogenized, and smeared onto a glass slide. This method has been found to prevent blood contamination and the drying or depletion of cells, which are known drawbacks of SC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been found to prevent blood contamination and the drying or depletion of cells, which are known drawbacks of SC. 61 A meta‐analysis comparing LBC and SC with ROSE for SPLs obtained via EUS‐TA found that SC had significantly higher sensitivity than LBC (90% vs. 60%; p < 0.05), suggesting that LBC might be less effective in facilities where ROSE is available. 62 By contrast, work from our group showed that the combination of LBC plus SC had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than SC alone (94.1% vs. 69.6%; p < 0.001), suggesting that the combination of LBC plus SC is superior to LBC alone or SC alone in the clinical evaluation of SPLs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 ] It is a rapid, sensitive, specific, and cost-effective method with a minimum rate of side effects. [ 3 , 4 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%