2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usefulness of Method-Resources for Evaluating a Collaborative Training Simulator

Abstract: Voice communication is vital for collaboration between first responders and commanders during crisis management. To decrease cost, training can take place in a virtual environment instead of in a real one. It is non-trivial to build and evaluate a virtual environment for training complex command. To understand the method-resources required for evaluating a training simulator for crisis response, this paper presents a case study of applying several resources. Method-resources were analysed for usability problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A usability evaluation of collaboration during crisis management training in a simulator implementing a soundscape has been conducted [92]. A collaborative scenario for two users playing the role of coordinators in the field and in a response-center was prepared.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A usability evaluation of collaboration during crisis management training in a simulator implementing a soundscape has been conducted [92]. A collaborative scenario for two users playing the role of coordinators in the field and in a response-center was prepared.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel to studying the learning effectiveness of simulator training, it is useful to study their usability and usefulness. Usability evaluation has been conducted of collaboration during crisis management training in a simulator implementing soundscape [20]. A collaborative scenario for two users playing the role of coordinators in the field and in a response center was given.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%