1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)96661-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The usefulness of the spinal and subcortical components of the posterior tibial nerve SEPs for spinal cord monitoring during aortic coarctation repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So we only could infer that SEP is a possible indicator for the cord ischemia. As a general rule in SEP monitoring, a 50% reduction in amplitude or a 10% increase in latency is considered as significant for monitoring [1,6,10]. According to this rule, all SEP changes in this study are not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So we only could infer that SEP is a possible indicator for the cord ischemia. As a general rule in SEP monitoring, a 50% reduction in amplitude or a 10% increase in latency is considered as significant for monitoring [1,6,10]. According to this rule, all SEP changes in this study are not significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…So they concluded that intraoperative tcMEPs had a good prognostic value for neurologic outcome during procedures in which the spinal cord was at risk for ischemia. Though SEP is still the most convenient and economical method for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring [9,10], we have to admit that MEP would have been a better choice. In this study, recovery of SEPs after transient changes corresponded with normal postoperative neurologic function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%