2019
DOI: 10.1097/fm9.0000000000000002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Usefulness of Zhukovsky Double Balloon in Obstetric Hemorrhage

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of a modified Zhukovsky double (vaginal and uterine) balloon to improve the results of treatment in women with obstetric hemorrhage.Methods: We conducted an observational controlled study including 701 puerperas, which were divided into two groups: The main group consisted of 508 women, who underwent a combined management, that is, traditional (transfusion of fresh frozen plasma, erythrocyte mass, uterotonics, hemostatic agents), surgical hemostasis in cases … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found very few studies reporting the effect of UBT in atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery. We excluded 13 analytical studies because outcomes were measured in all births, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 without disaggregating data according to the mode of delivery (Table S4 ), with one‐quarter to one‐half of the included cases ending in caesarean sections. Six studies were excluded due to: insufficient data, 39 , 40 involved women having a caesarean section, 41 the intervention being administered as part of a package, 42 UBT being administered as a first‐line treatment for PPH, 43 the outcomes reported differing from the prioritised outcomes in this systematic review 44 , 45 , 46 or involving the comparison of two different types of UBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found very few studies reporting the effect of UBT in atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery. We excluded 13 analytical studies because outcomes were measured in all births, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 without disaggregating data according to the mode of delivery (Table S4 ), with one‐quarter to one‐half of the included cases ending in caesarean sections. Six studies were excluded due to: insufficient data, 39 , 40 involved women having a caesarean section, 41 the intervention being administered as part of a package, 42 UBT being administered as a first‐line treatment for PPH, 43 the outcomes reported differing from the prioritised outcomes in this systematic review 44 , 45 , 46 or involving the comparison of two different types of UBT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%