2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The uses of qualitative data in multimethodology: Developing causal loop diagrams during the coding process

Abstract: -In this research note we describe a method for exploring the creation of causal loop diagrams (CLDs) from the coding trees developed through a grounded theory approach and using computer aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). The theoretical background to the approach is multimethodology, in line with Minger's description of paradigm crossing and is appropriately situated within the Appreciate and Analyse phases of PSM intervention. The practical use of this method has been explored and three case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The former is concerned with the feasibility of mixing methodologies from different paradigms -namely, the commensurability versus incommensurability debate -(e.g. Eden, Ackermann, Bryson, Richardson, & Andersen, 2009;Jackson, 2009;Kotiadis & Mingers, 2006;Mingers, 1997;Zhu, 2011); whereas the latter relates to the different ways in which specific methodologies, methods and tools are actually mixed in organisational interventions (Brown, Cooper, & Pidd, 2006;Ferreira, 2013;Franco & Lord, 2011;Gondal, 2004;Ormerod, 2001;Pollack, 2009;Small & Wainwright, 2014;Sørensen, Vidal, & Engstrom, 2004;Tako & Kotiadis, 2015;Williams, Ackermann, & Eden, 2003;Yearworth & White, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is concerned with the feasibility of mixing methodologies from different paradigms -namely, the commensurability versus incommensurability debate -(e.g. Eden, Ackermann, Bryson, Richardson, & Andersen, 2009;Jackson, 2009;Kotiadis & Mingers, 2006;Mingers, 1997;Zhu, 2011); whereas the latter relates to the different ways in which specific methodologies, methods and tools are actually mixed in organisational interventions (Brown, Cooper, & Pidd, 2006;Ferreira, 2013;Franco & Lord, 2011;Gondal, 2004;Ormerod, 2001;Pollack, 2009;Small & Wainwright, 2014;Sørensen, Vidal, & Engstrom, 2004;Tako & Kotiadis, 2015;Williams, Ackermann, & Eden, 2003;Yearworth & White, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, our approach uses a CAQDAS so that the references from the final causal diagram to the data sources can be maintained, as in the approach of Yearworth and White [22]. To better explain the deviations from Kim and Andersen's method, we use the framework introduced by Turner, Kim and Andersen [21], which identifies six research design dimensions important in forming an alternative coding approach.…”
Section: Coding Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this abundance of data, a thorough but quick analysis of it becomes vitally important to obtain useful information. The matrix query run by Yearworth and White [22] to identify causal relationships is a preliminary step in incorporating such analysis techniques to model conceptualization. Automated techniques are not expected to identify causal relationships completely, yet they can be employed further to assist the coder and modeler to make faster use of large amounts of textual data.…”
Section: The Use Of Software and Data Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grounded theory (GT): GT approach relies heavily on qualitative data analysis based on 'coding' of textual data [21,22] that can be collected through interviews with stakeholders as well as can be retrieved from transcriptions of different-sourced interviews, observations, memoranda, or any kind of textual data. The process of transforming the data into model insights consists of a set of techniques from the identification of categories or concepts across the texts to linking them to explicit meaningful theories.…”
Section: Mediated Modelling (Mm)mentioning
confidence: 99%