2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2012)068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The UTfit collaboration average of D meson mixing data: spring 2012

Abstract: We derive constraints on the parameters M 12 , Γ 12 and Φ 12 that describe D meson mixing using all available data, allowing for CP violation. We also provide posterior distributions and predictions for observable parameters appearing in D physics.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in very good agreement with the fit labelled "No direct CPV in DCS decays" by HFAG [6], now that HFAG uses the theoretical relation in eq. (1.4) as we suggested in our first paper [1].…”
Section: Pos(ckm2016)143supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in very good agreement with the fit labelled "No direct CPV in DCS decays" by HFAG [6], now that HFAG uses the theoretical relation in eq. (1.4) as we suggested in our first paper [1].…”
Section: Pos(ckm2016)143supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Since 2012, the UTfit Collaboration has performed its own combination of the D mixing experimental data, yielding a quite precise determination of the mixing parameters showing no sign of CP violation [1,2]. The spectacular experimental progress that we have witnessed in the past few years is leading us in the precision charm physics era, calling for substantial theoretical advances to fully exploit the wealth of available data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get the Uppuer bound Uppuer bound constraints, we evolve the Wilson coefficients down to relevant hadronic scale and then use the results of new physics fits of refs. [39][40][41]. The CP phase is chosen so that the strongest constraint is to be obtained.…”
Section: Meson Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ETM N f = 2 configurations at four lattice spacings (0.05, 0.07, 0.09, and 0.10 fm), O(a) improved Ostwerwalder-Seiler valence quarks, and pions as light as 280 MeV, they calculate the bag parameters to 3 − 5% precision. This is about five time more precise than current equivalent experimental precision [57,58] and on par with 2020 expectations [59]. FNAL/MILC [60] presented preliminary results for the mixing matrix elements from a calculation using the MILC N f = 2 + 1 asqtad configurations at four lattice spacings (0.045, 0.06, 0.09, and 0.12 fm), asqtad light and FNAL charm valence quarks, and with pions as light as 177 MeV.…”
Section: Mixingmentioning
confidence: 75%