2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of breast cone-beam computed tomography, ultrasound, and digital mammography for detecting malignant breast tumors: A prospective study with 212 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…CBCT is a novel approach of breast investigation [8], [10], [18], [19]. To date, there are only few reports regarding this modality [8], [10], [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CBCT is a novel approach of breast investigation [8], [10], [18], [19]. To date, there are only few reports regarding this modality [8], [10], [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are only few reports regarding this modality [8], [10], [19]. As mentioned by O′Connel et al, breast CT displays 3D images of the internal structures of the breast, and, therefore, evaluation of suspicious features like microcalcifications, masses, and asymmetries can be made in multiple anatomical planes from a single scan [10], [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CBBCT does not require compression and can be performed without or with iodinated contrast (NC‐CBBCT or CE‐CBBCT, respectively) . Some small studies have shown that NC‐CBBCT accurately diagnosed malignancies and had higher malignancy identification rates compared with mammogram and ultrasound . CE‐CBBCT has been thought to demonstrate tumor angiogenesis.…”
Section: Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggest that 2 minutes is the optimal time for CE‐CBBCT. When comparing imaging modalities, CE‐CBBCT has been shown to have improved malignancy detection compared with mammograms . Wienbeck, et al have shown that MRI and CE‐CBBCT were more sensitive and accurate compared to noncontrast enhanced studies such as mammogram and NC‐CBBCT, but they are less specific.…”
Section: Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%