2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of fasting glucose for detection of prediabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, a revealing study involving young African-American subjects compared FPG to OGTT to diagnose glucose intolerance. FPG (110 mg/dl) detected only 27.4% of cases, OGTT 87,1%; when the 2003 ADA criteria were applied, the FPG threshold of 100 mg/dl did not perform any better, identifying only 28.9% of glucose intolerance cases (Cheng et al, 2006). Furthermore, beside the evidence that FPG cannot be equated to 2hPG (Carnevale Schianca et al, 2003;Rizza, 2010), it has been demonstrated that 2hPG more efficiently predicts the risk of heart disease than FPG (DECODE Study Group, 1998).…”
Section: The History Of the Ogttmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As an example, a revealing study involving young African-American subjects compared FPG to OGTT to diagnose glucose intolerance. FPG (110 mg/dl) detected only 27.4% of cases, OGTT 87,1%; when the 2003 ADA criteria were applied, the FPG threshold of 100 mg/dl did not perform any better, identifying only 28.9% of glucose intolerance cases (Cheng et al, 2006). Furthermore, beside the evidence that FPG cannot be equated to 2hPG (Carnevale Schianca et al, 2003;Rizza, 2010), it has been demonstrated that 2hPG more efficiently predicts the risk of heart disease than FPG (DECODE Study Group, 1998).…”
Section: The History Of the Ogttmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The attempt to screen glucose tolerance using FPG alone has been disavowed by several epidemiological observations. At variance with one single study involving three ethnic groups in the United Kingdom (Unwin et al, 1998), reporting a better prediction for diabetes from FPG with respect to 2hPG, FPG alone was shown to underestimate the diabetes prevalence when compared to 2hPG (Cheng et al, 2006;Harris et al, 1997). To ameliorate the diagnostic power of FPG, in 2003 the ADA lowered from 110 to 100 mg/dl its cut-off to define prediabetes (Genut et al, 2003).…”
Section: The History Of the Ogttmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies have compared different methods of diabetes screening [19], most proposing the use of FPG in patients with risk factors for DM and OGTT in patients with FPG between 5.5 and 6.9 mmol/l. One recent study determined the utility of FPG alone for detecting prediabetes concluding that FPG testing (threshold value of 5.5 mmol/l) alone may be inadequate for diagnosing prediabetes and that OGTT is a more sensitive method for detecting the prediabetic condition in their high-risk population [20]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 For an FPG test, a venous blood sample is drawn in the physician's office following a 12-hour overnight fast. This specimen is analyzed in a core laboratory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%