The Utility of Hybrid Promotion and Tenure Tracks for Dental School Faculty

Abstract

The promotion and tenure process for faculty members varies, by design, for different disciplines, departments, and academic institutions. For many faculty members in U.S. dental schools, the process may thus appear nebulous and be dificult to navigate. In this article, we review the history, forces of change, and some of the mechanisms utilized for promotion and tenure of faculty in the health sciences, particularly for clinician-educators. Some institutions have successfully created hybrid tracks for clinician-educators in order to develop and recognize these faculty members' scholarly activity in addition to their clinical teaching. Hybrid tracks empower faculty members to successfully perform scholarly activities that realistically relect institutional missions. The authors of this article conclude with a number of practical suggestions to enhance development and retention of faculty using the hybrid promotion and tenure mechanism. These include demonstrating the congruence of institutional mission, faculty activities, and promotion and tenure guidelines; developing scholarly activities for clinician-educators that can be measured in the promotion and tenure process; rewarding scholarly achievement for clinician-educators utilizing the promotion and tenure mechanism; and developing an evaluation system that accounts for changes in mission and faculty activities.Dr. Costello is Professor and

Which Way to Lean? A National Study of Women Dental Faculty Members’ Career Aspirations and Choices

“…Dental schools should be active in advocating for flexible promotion and tenure policies at their institutions that take into account the various teaching responsibilities and distribution of efforts of their faculties. Strategies such as hybrid clinician‐educator tracks that enable clinically active faculty members to achieve promotion and tenure are needed if we are to retain our best and brightest educators 31 …”

Challenges and Solutions for The Promotion of Medical Sciences Faculty Members in Iran: A Systematic Review

“…Another challenge to the regulations is that they render all universities, disciplines and individuals' capabilities to be similar. Despite differences in the requirements and needs of different disciplines and the variety in potential and actual capabilities in different areas of the country, the regulations assess all these disciplines, universities, and individuals based on the same structure (14,15). Moreover, the mission, requirements, special circumstances, resources, and scienti c facilities of each university have not been considered.…”

“…As a result of the present regulations, the publication of scienti c papers has become a daily concern for faculty members. This has led to a decrease in the amount of time spent on educational activities and executive responsibilities (14).…”

“…Furthermore, focusing on the number of papers instead of quality has adversely reduced the number of faculty members pursuing other research activities such as writing and translating books (13). Increasing the sustainability and destination of research activities, emphasizing their role in creating change in the relevant scienti c eld, and developing indicators of research activity from the number of papers to more diverse indicators such originality and innovation, and fundraising for research proposals are some suggestions to reform regulations of research activities (14).…”

“…Challenges to scienti c-executive activities were the easiness of acquiring privileges accordingly and this in turn negatively in uences persuading faculty members to accept challenging executive responsibilities in the university, ignoring the social status of faculty members and also the stress caused by the abovementioned responsibilities, overlooking the quality of individual performance, and the limited chance available to females to occupy managerial positions (10,14). Applying strategies such as raising the quality of administrative work, facilitating the functions of the university to achieve its goals can contribute to solve the above challenges (15).…”