2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of network analysis in the context of Indigenous Australian oral health literacy

Abstract: Background The study of oral health literacy (OHL) is likely to gain new and interesting insights with the use of network analysis, a powerful analytical tool that allows the investigation of complex systems of relationships. Our aim was to investigate the relationships between oral health literacy and oral health-related factors in a sample of Indigenous Australian adults using a network analysis approach. Methods Data from 400 Indigenous Australian adults was used to estimate four regularised partial correla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our results, a previous study found a consistent pattern of strong item conditional associations within HeLD-14 theoretical domains. [32] Nevertheless, the findings of this study demonstrate that the Brazilian version of the HeLD-14 presents a slightly distinct structure to the originally proposed 7-factor composition. [32] The different number of dimensions is likely to result from measuring attributes of the Brazilian version of the instrument or cultural aspects related to how these constructs (most specifically Utilization and Communication) are understood by this population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In line with our results, a previous study found a consistent pattern of strong item conditional associations within HeLD-14 theoretical domains. [32] Nevertheless, the findings of this study demonstrate that the Brazilian version of the HeLD-14 presents a slightly distinct structure to the originally proposed 7-factor composition. [32] The different number of dimensions is likely to result from measuring attributes of the Brazilian version of the instrument or cultural aspects related to how these constructs (most specifically Utilization and Communication) are understood by this population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…On the other hand, a network model assumes the reciprocally reinforcing causal relations between the behaviors of fighting, lying, stealing, losing temper, and disobeying of children that can be labeled as "conduct problems" (Borsboom and Cramer, 2013). Network models seem particularly suitable to understand SEWB among Indigenous people as their wellbeing is holistic (Kendall et al, 2019) and influenced by a complex interplay of structural, contextual, and individual factors, such as colonization, historical trauma, resilience, and discrimination (Soares et al, 2020). For instance, previous studies have emphasized the importance of network models to describe the health of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander by comparing the unique causal components of a psychological network (nodes) and their associations (edges) with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders most distinctive art style, dot painting (Soares et al, 2021).…”
Section: Comparison Between Factor and Network Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Australia has reported the nation's health literacy in 2006 and 2018 (Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS], 2008; 2018), different methods were used on each occasion with the most recent results, indicating that those with chronic diseases had lower health literacy abilities and were also less engaged with the healthcare system. Previous Australian studies have examined First Nations people's health literacy in dental care (Parker et al, 2012; Soares et al, 2020), men's health (Smith et al, 2020), cancer care (Treloar et al, 2013), chronic disease (de‐identified for review) and primary health care (Lakhan et al, 2017). Four of these studies assessed only functional health literacy (Lakhan et al, 2017; Parker et al, 2012; Soares et al, 2020) while three studies explored First Nations people's health literacy qualitatively (Rheault et al, 2021; Smith et al, 2020; Treloar et al, 2013 (de‐identified for review)), indicating that communication with healthcare providers is problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous Australian studies have examined First Nations people's health literacy in dental care (Parker et al, 2012; Soares et al, 2020), men's health (Smith et al, 2020), cancer care (Treloar et al, 2013), chronic disease (de‐identified for review) and primary health care (Lakhan et al, 2017). Four of these studies assessed only functional health literacy (Lakhan et al, 2017; Parker et al, 2012; Soares et al, 2020) while three studies explored First Nations people's health literacy qualitatively (Rheault et al, 2021; Smith et al, 2020; Treloar et al, 2013 (de‐identified for review)), indicating that communication with healthcare providers is problematic. Greater understanding of the multidimensional health literacy capabilities of First Nations people is urgently needed particularly in the context of chronic disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%